[gothic-l] Re: Counts of Coimbra ?
faltin2001
dirk at SMRA.CO.UK
Mon Jul 15 08:28:48 UTC 2002
--- In gothic-l at y..., "F. E. Ximenez" <jimenezf01 at m...> wrote:
> Dear Dirk,
>
> faltin2001 wrote:
>
> > Hello all,
> >
> > the continuity of Visigothic tradition in Spain and Portugal is an
> > interesting issue. However,
>
> What exactly do you mean by Visigothic tradition?
> What exactly would it take to legitimize a "Visigothic identity"?
Hi F.E. Ximenez,
I meant this only in general terms. A Visigothic identity can be real
or perceived. I think it is possible that it was revived in
retrospect during the medieval period, when it was usefull as a non-
Muslem identity and legitimacy.
>
> > Julian von Toledo (died 690) distinguishes in his Historia Wambae
> > Regis only between Spaniards (Hispani) and Gauls (Septimani and
> > Galli). He does not mention Visigoths (or Suevi) in Spain, which
has
> > been interpreted to mean that Visigoths no longer had a
> > distinguishable identity by that time, but considered themselves
> > mainly as Spaniards. The chronicles of 754 also makes no
mentioning of
> > Visigoths for the
> > whole period from 711, which also underlines the fact that a
separate
> > Visigothic identity had become at best an amorphous concept by the
> > time of the Moslem conquest.
>
> SOME THINGS TO CONSIDER:
> 1). There could be reasons (OTHER THAN THE ONES YOU STATE) for not
> mentioning some sort of Visigothic identity in the Wamba Regis.
Certainly, yet in the Wamba Regis Visigoths were identified as
Hispani, which seemed to have been agreeable to them, thus indicating
that a Visigothic identity had become amourphous. This is also only
natural, since Visigothic elites had intermarried with the Roman
elites (and other local groups) for several generations. Thus, the
term Hispani was likely seen as more accurate than Visigothic for
most of them.
> 2). Isidore of Seville D.636 (writing prior to the Wamba Regis)
mentions
> certain traditions, customs and habits peculiar to the Visigoths.
One
> such was the way the Visigothic Kings traveled. Isidore tells
us: "They
> wore a golden crown, were encumbered with a heavy robe of silken
> embroidery, and reclined on a litter or car of ivory drawn by two
white
> asses led by valets, as was the way the Gothic kings of those days
went
> about". With the latter in mind allow me to mention two ( 2 )
peculiar
> equine bits found by archaeologists some time ago. They were
identified
> as King Witiza's due to a latten inlay bearing the initials V over
A as
> well as their provenance. The curious thing about the TWO bits is
that
> they have no fillet reins, which means that a mounted rider could
not
> have used them. Instead, we find two rings for the fastening of
leather
> straps by which a valet could lead the animal about. (Artiñano y
> Galdecano, P.M., "Exposición de Hierros Antiguos Españoles" 1919:
42).
> The latter shows that certain Visigothic traditions were still
alive in
> 710 CE, a year prior to the invasion by the Moors.
> 3). The Wamba Regis is only one manuscript as opposed to so many
others
> that do mention a Visigothic identity during different periods in
> history. For example, THE CITY OF UVIÉU, (OVIEDO) IN what is now the
> province of ASTURIAS (AN AREA NEVER BREACHED BY THE MOORS), BECAME
THE
> URBS REGIA, THE 'ROYAL SEAT' OF THE (VISIGOTHIC NOBILITY) AFTER THE
> MOORISH INVASION. Oviedo in essence became the staging ground of the
> Reconquest. It was in Oviedo that Alfonse II (of direct Visigothic
> ancestry) reinstates a second Visigothic kingdom. THE LATTER IS
ATTESTED
> IN HIS OWN WORDS IN THE CHRONICLE OF ALBELDA IN ABOUT THE YEAR 822
CE.
> (Many years after "Wamba Regis"). The Chronicle of Albelda
reinstates
> the Visigothic Kingdom at Ovieu in the following words:
> "OMNEM GOTORUM ORDINEM SICUT TOLETO FUERAT " ( THE WHOLE
ORGANIZATION OF
> THE GOTHS JUST AS IT WAS AT TOLEDO).
>
I am not familiar with these sources. Yet, I know the assessment that
I presented has a firm basis in the academic literature .
> > However, Moslem leaders did claim decent
> > from king Witiza, whom they regarded as the last legitimate king.
In
> > these claims the Visigothic ethnic component was, however,
> > irrelevant - let alone their Christianity of course. What was
> > important to the new Moslem/Berber elites was to cement their own
> > legitimacy to rule over Spain by (initially mainly invented)
> > association with the previous dynasty.
> >
> > I suppose there is reason to believe that a Visigothic ethnic
> > identity was only 'resurrected' later during medieval times,
probably
> > in conjuntion with the 'Reconquista', when the Visigoths were
seen as
> > legitimate, and above all, Christian Catholic rulers of Spain, as
> > opposed to the Moslems, who were seen as illegitimate usurpers. I
> > think that claims to Visigothic decent by individual noble
families
> > should mainly be seen in this context.
>
> There are pedigrees (many directly to the Visigothic kings) for a
great
> majority of the Nobles that took refuge in Asturias, many seem to
have
> been aware of their ancestry and its implications.
>
That is well possible. However, as I mentioned also Moslem and Berber
elites claimed decent from Witiza and there was intermarriage between
Moslem and Christian (Visigothic) elites in the preceeding period.
> > They were more a reflection of
> > Christian Medieval Spanish identity rather than a reality
connected
> > directly to the end of the Visigothic period. This does of course
not
> > change the fact that some of the oldest noble families
(especially in
> > regions like Asturias) were partly of Visigothic decent, but this
was
>
> > mostly irrelevant in the context of the late 7th century but only
> > assumed importance in later centuries.
>
> The word "partly" and "descent" are very problematic. I suppose
that any
> individual may be "partly" descended from many different things e.g.
> (apes, paleolithic people, Celts, the ancient autochtonous
populations
> of certain areas. An Englishman may be all of the latter despite the
> fact that he and his ancestors may have lived in Anglia since the
40,000
> Angles landed there in the early fifth century thus, he may claim
to be
> of English descent, but is he really?.
>
I don't think that the words 'partly' and 'decent' are very
problematic. These supposedly Visigothic nobles would almost
invariably have had also Roman and other local ancestors. So their
decent can only have been partly Visigothic at any rate. A. Schwarcz
has shown in an article on Visigothic elites in the 5th century, that
even Visigothic military leaders were sometimes actually Roman
aristocrats. What will have mainly mattered to them in the 7th/8th
centuries was the fact that they were Catholic Christians. This was
something that united them with all other Catholic Hispani in the
country and distinguished them from Moslems and Jews.
cheers,
Dirk
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --- In gothic-l at y..., Pat Christiansen <tigerlipped at y...> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi Ximenez:
> > > Where do the Basque fit into this picture? Could you direct me
to
> > some recent studies on the Basque? Thank you in advance.
> > > Ben
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > "F. E. Ximenez" <jimenezf01 at m...> wrote: Greetings Sahin,
> > > I believe it is you who stated (as your opinion) that (Carlos
> > Carvalho)
> > > "may have considerable connection to the 'Arabic' people as a
> > Portuguese
> > >
" Your statement seems to infer that considerable admixture,
must
> > have
> > > occurred (after) the Moorish invasion of the Visigothic Kingdom
in
> > 711.
> > > However it is quite the contrary; - the published work ("Genetic
> > > diversity in the Iberian Peninsula" -1996 - Corte Real;
Macaulay;
> > > Bertranpetit and Sykes) found that
"the majority of Iberian
> > ["mtDNA"
> > > (mitochondrial DNA)] lineages resemble those of central and
northern
> >
> > > Europe ["being quite close or identical"] (Richards et al.
1996)."
> > The
> > > study further states "only a small proportion of lineages
appear to
> > > originate in north Africa"
"It seems therefore that the genetic
> > > contribution by the Moorish presence in the peninsula, which has
> > been
> > > considered by some as substantial, has left little trace in the
> > modern
> > > mtDNA gene pool" (of Iberia).
> > >
> > > On the other hand, according to the same study, you are quite
> > right. The
> > > presence of a transition at position 126 of the haplotype in
> > question in
> > > present European populations (found at a 50% frequency in Middle
> > Eastern
> > > populations) and from (6%-12% in European populations ) seems to
> > > indicate that several waves of immigrants from the Middle East
> > entered
> > > and settled in Europe in the period between 6000 and 12000 years
> > before
> > > present. Generally - the latter seems to coincide with the first
> > > evidence of agriculture as well as the "Linienbandkeramik" and
> > Impressed
> > > Ware cultures of central Europe and the Mediterranean coast
> > > respectively.
> > >
> > > Enough for now-
> > > Will answer other mail when I'm back in the office on Friday.
> > > Cheers,
> > > Frithunanths Ximenez.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
> > > You are a member of the Gothic-L list. To unsubscribe, send a
> > blank email to <gothic-l-unsubscribe at e...>.
> > >
> > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
> > Service.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > ---------------------------------
> > > Post your ad for free now! Yahoo! Canada Personals
> > >
> > >
> > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
> >
> > Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
> ADVERTISEMENT
>
> >
> > You are a member of the Gothic-L list. To unsubscribe, send a
blank
> > email to <gothic-l-unsubscribe at e...>.
> >
> > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
Service.
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~-->
Save on REALTOR Fees
http://us.click.yahoo.com/Xw80LD/h1ZEAA/Ey.GAA/wWMplB/TM
---------------------------------------------------------------------~->
You are a member of the Gothic-L list. To unsubscribe, send a blank email to <gothic-l-unsubscribe at egroups.com>.
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
More information about the Gothic-l
mailing list