Arain Christian influence on Islam
ualarauans
ualarauans at YAHOO.COM
Sat Mar 31 22:33:45 UTC 2007
Hailai,
How would you explain the fragment Skeir. 7:7
akei nauh us þamma filu mais siponjans fullafahida jah anþarans
gamaudida gaumjan, þatei is was sa sama, saei in auþidai m jere
attans ize fodida...
"but much more from this (five loaves and two fishes) he (Jesus) had
satisfied the disciples and reminded the others to see that he was
THE SAME WHO FED THEIR FATHERS IN THE DESERT FOUR HUNDRED YEARS".
As you see Jesus is literally identified with God Father. Is this
view really Arian? If not, how did it get here?
Ualarauans
----- Original Message -----
From: "Wolfgang Franz" <wolfgang.franz at ...>
To: <gothic-l at yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Saturday, March 31, 2007 2:35 AM
Subject: Re: [gothic-l] Re: Arain Christian influence on Islam
I think it can't be emphazised often enough: Arius did not deny the
divinity
of the Christ. For Arius Christ was created before creation but in
time. But
the Christ (the logos) was created. And this is the difference to
the rest
of
christianity: That He was created while in the creed of Nicaia He is
procreated. In Arius' opinion the logos was god second class but god
nevertheless.
What you describe is adoptianism, condemned always when it came
around in
the
early church. In the course of the bitter struggle about the trinity
after
the council of Nicaia some radical arianists (Aetius) became
adoptianists as
well. But the original Arius was not.
Wulfila was even more towards the orthodox nicaian church. It looks
that he
was arian by accident only. When he was consecrated bishop arianism
was the
leading party in the east. And afterwards Wulfila was too
straightforward to
change his mind.
Am Samstag, 31. März 2007 07:00 schrieb Le Bateman:
> I am just thinking about the similarity in the belief Jesus was
born of
> a
> virgin, but not divine. This was the teaching of Arius. All of the
Church
> fathers including Ireneus, who was the disciple of Polycarp, who
is said
> to
> be John The Beloved Disciple. All of them taught that Arianism was
a
> heretical sect. Muhammad lived in the 6th Century, and died at
the time
> that Redwald King of East Anglia died in 632 A.D. So he would have
> encountered the Monks who live in the Sinai.
> They have a monastery on Mount Sinia. Or somewhere on the Sinai or
Arabian
> Peninsula. I am thinking of the Greek Orthodox monks. I also
believe the
> Coptic Christians of Egypt were around as well. So they were
around. It is
> possible he did come incontact with him. The Quran does call these
and the
> Jews Unbelievers. So he was aware of them. I will have to reread
the
> Quran.
> Le
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Baira" <baira_bear at ...>
> To: <gothic-l at yahoogroups.com>
> Sent: Friday, March 30, 2007 6:07 AM
> Subject: [gothic-l] Re: Arain Christian influence on Islam
>
> --- In gothic-l at yahoogroups.com, "Le Bateman" <LeBateman at ...>
wrote:
> > Does anyone know if there was a strong Arian influence on
Islam.
>
> They both
>
> > seemed to view Jesus as important, but not devine as the Orthodox
>
> faith.
>
> > Could Mohammed have known the followers of Ulfius.I probably
have the
> > Bishop's name spelled wrong.
> > Le
>
> It is very, very doubtful. Many historians of the Islamic religion
> believe that Mohammad was personally acquainted with the Jewish
> religion but not with the Christian one, which he knew just by
> hearsay. If so, it was highly unlikely that he knew the beliefs of
a
> 'heretical' sect.
>
> In Islamic religion Jesus is a prophet, just like Moses and
Abraham.
> The greatest of the prophets before Mohammed, but a prophet,
nothing
> more and nothing less.
>
> Besides, if you are not a Christian you will not only never accept
the
> divine nature of Jesus, but you will not even pose yourself the
question.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listserv.linguistlist.org/pipermail/gothic-l/attachments/20070331/e360ee5e/attachment.htm>
More information about the Gothic-l
mailing list