[gothic-l] Re: is Gothic the language of one or a few men?
Dicentis a roellingua@gmail.com [gothic-l]
gothic-l at yahoogroups.com
Fri Feb 13 00:05:15 UTC 2015
Hails Audamund,
Thanks for your correction. Yes, I didn't use the book but I tried to write
down what I remember, I was unsure about the i-stems. Thanks for correcting
me.
Golja thuk,
Hrothiland
2015-02-13 1:03 GMT+01:00 edmundfairfax at yahoo.ca [gothic-l] <
gothic-l at yahoogroups.com>:
>
>
> Dear Roel,
>
> Note that the connecting vowel for i-stems is not -a- but -i-: cf.
> gastigoths, naudibandi. O-stems do indeed take -a-: cf. airthakunds,
> hleithrastakeins.
>
> Audamunds
>
>
> ---In gothic-l at yahoogroups.com, <roellingua at ...> wrote :
>
> Although these are the rules as described in Braune's grammar book, the
> knowledge of Proto-Germanic wasn't as good as it is now, and I see more
> reconstructions which follow the proto-germanic like Hrothiland, so I would
> say, no, but in some cases this system is to be applied.
>
> 2015-02-13 0:08 GMT+01:00 write2andy at ... [gothic-l] <
> gothic-l at yahoogroups.com>:
>
>
>
> So, for example, "hamstring" would be "hamaráips", even though the first
> element is from PG *"hamo^"?
>
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listserv.linguistlist.org/pipermail/gothic-l/attachments/20150213/944725ef/attachment.htm>
More information about the Gothic-l
mailing list