implementation platform for SBCG

[Mariana Hebborn]

Great! Thank you Stefan!

Best regards Mariana

2010/7/26 Stefan Müller <Stefan.Mueller at fu-berlin.de>

> Hi Mariana,
>
> If you do not insist on the MOTHER feature you can use both systems
> right away. Using MOTHER would make some minor changes to the parser
> necessary (the implementational equivalent to the Meta principle that
> licences signs). Maybe there is already an LKB version that does work
> with MOTHER. TRALE does not do it right now.
>
> But you can just represent PHON, SYN, and SEM at the toplevel and not
> use any DTRS feature and you are pretty close to SB-CxG. If you do not
> want to use a DTRS feature explicietly, TRALE does not require one, so
> you have the desired locality restrictions.
>
> On the other hand you may want to keep the DTRS to analyze certain
> idioms. See for instance the following paper for reasons to keep this
> feature:
>
> http://cslipublications.stanford.edu/HPSG/2009/richter-sailer.pdf
>
> Gert Webelhuth just finished a SB-CxG paper and he uses Trale for
> implementational purposes.
>
>
> Best wishes
>
>        Stefan
>
> --
> Stefan Müller       Tel: (+49) (+30) 838 52973
>                    Fax: (+49) (030) 838 4 52973
> Institut für Deutsche und Niederländische Philologie
> Deutsche Grammatik
> Habelschwerdter Allee 45
> 14 195 Berlin
>
> http://hpsg.fu-berlin.de/~stefan/ <http://hpsg.fu-berlin.de/%7Estefan/>
>
> http://hpsg.fu-berlin.de/~stefan/Babel/Interaktiv/<http://hpsg.fu-berlin.de/%7Estefan/Babel/Interaktiv/>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listserv.linguistlist.org/pipermail/hpsg-l/attachments/20100726/e4f870a7/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------