No subject

[Ted Moomaw]

way' xast sxlxalt, Hello

 

I like lexique pro, well organized, navigation thru links is alot of fun,
you can categorize lexical entries. as for solid linguistic research I think
it is awesome, you are able to design your dictionary in ways to show the
morphologic make up of each entry 

with links to its appropriate pref. rt. affix's suffix's.  I have
categorized my roots, affixes and linked them to entries of usage.

 

Lexique pro uses Toolbox as its database, and there is a modest learning
curve figuring out how to best utilize, and understand Toolbox. I would'nt
call it a Negative, but it takes time to learn.  

 

You can make your entries and edit withing Lex but it is slow going, Toolbox
is much easier to enter data into.

 

I have worked with no other Dict.

 

My Biased Opinion, all the Best,

Ted 

 

  _____  

From: Indigenous Languages and Technology [mailto:ILAT at LISTSERV.ARIZONA.EDU]
On Behalf Of Heather Souter
Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2009 12:15 PM
To: ILAT at LISTSERV.ARIZONA.EDU
Subject: [ILAT]

 

Taanshi kiiyawaaw,  hello,

I wanted to pose a question to the list.  

If you were to list some of the top technologically innovative online
dictionaries for endangered languages, what would they be and why?  Also, if
you were to list some of the most user friendly online dictionaries that
also can also supply solid linguistic information to further research what
would they be and why?

I look forward to any and all posts regarding the above questions.

Eekoshi pitamaa.  That's it for now.

Heather,
Metis, Emerging Michif speaker, community language researcher, grad
student....

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listserv.linguistlist.org/pipermail/ilat/attachments/20090121/fff39c3e/attachment.htm>