Feminines in Neuter Plurals
iffr762 at utxvms.cc.utexas.edu
iffr762 at utxvms.cc.utexas.edu
Sat Mar 6 16:02:45 UTC 1999
What exactly is the argument here? That if the feminine had been
a recent development from the masculine, the masculine plural rather than
the neuter would be used for mixed M/F plurals, therefore the feminine
cannot be a recent development from the masculine? What if the feminine
is a recent development from the neuter/inanimate? Very un-PC, I know,
but stranger (and more un-PC) things have happened. And is it not true
the Conventional Wisdom has the feminine developing from the
neuter/inanimate anyway? Perhaps I am missing something, but I find it
difficult to understand what is being alledged.
DLW
More information about the Indo-european
mailing list