rate of change

Rick Mc Callister rmccalli at sunmuw1.MUW.Edu
Mon Mar 8 17:43:47 UTC 1999


[ moderator re-formatted ]

>Max W. Wheeler <maxw at cogs.susx.ac.uk>

>On Wed, 24 Feb 1999, Rick Mc Callister wrote:
>
>> But before 1500, Spanish & Portuguese were farther apart than they are now.

>Oh yeah? Who says? It wouldn't take long to list some significant
>changes in Spanish since 1500 which have moved it away from Portuguese.
>But it won't be worth it without a good reason to believe the claim made
>above.

You missed the context. I was speaking about lexical items.
Yes-- Spanish has dropped future subjunctive
and has reduced
	/sh, zh/ > /x, h/
	/s, z/ > /s, S/
	/dz, ts/ > /s, th/
and pretty much mutated
	/L/ > /j, zh, Y, sh/
BUT lexically, Spanish and Portuguese are more alike
	grammatically, some Spanish and Portuguese dialects are replacing
condicional with imperfect & imperfect subjunctive

Rick Mc Callister
W-1634
MUW
Columbus MS 39701
rmccalli at sunmuw1.muw.edu



More information about the Indo-european mailing list