lenis and glottalic
Dr. John E. McLaughlin and Michelle R. Sutton
mclasutt at brigham.net
Mon Mar 15 06:57:09 UTC 1999
[ moderator re-formatted ]
Glen Gordon wrote:
> On the subject of lenis/fortis, Miguel seems to be suggesting that lenis
> stops (or "long stops") tend to voice more often than fortis stops. So
> might I ask, is this true?
In the Numic languages of Uto-Aztecan, this is a cold, hard fact: Short
voiceless plosives are voiced and become [+cont] between vowels absolutely and
in casual speech in initial position as well (but not [+cont]). Long voiceless
plosives are not even shortened in intervocalic position, but remain voiceless
and [-cont].
John McLaughlin
Utah State University
More information about the Indo-european
mailing list