IE to ProtoSteppe

[JoatSimeon at aol.com]

>In a message dated 3/14/99 9:06:56 PM Mountain Standard Time,
>glengordon01 at hotmail.com writes:

>_Physical_ proof of the nature of particles?? I don't think so. It is based on
>observation.

-- that is physical proof -- experimental validation.  All humans can do is
observe.

>It can't tell us the actual form of a particle.

-- yes it can, insofar as "form" is meaningful when speaking of say, an
electron, which is best described in terms of probability shells.

>Don't be daft.

-- right back at you.

[ Moderator's note:
  This has drifted beyond the scope of linguistics, Indo-European or otherwise.
  No further discussion on this branch of the discussion will be posted to the
  list; please take it to private e-mail if you wish to continue.
  --rma ]