Celtic influence
JoatSimeon at aol.com
JoatSimeon at aol.com
Tue Mar 23 02:03:20 UTC 1999
>iffr762 at utxvms.cc.utexas.edu writes:
>Yes it will. The kingdom of Scotland had been Gaelic-using till shortly (as
>linguistic time is measured) before. Thus, just as in England, there had
>been little time for divergence to evolve.
-- Lothian was settled by Angles at the same time as the settlements further
south. The Lowlands were Lallans-speaking by the early medieval period. The
line of division with Gaelic then remained fairly stable until the early
modern period.
>So your theory then enables us to confidently (or should I say immodestly)
>predict that Southern aristocrats speak Black English.
-- "spoke". A closely related dialect. They've diverged since 1865, as
social distance grew.
>1) why ME diverges from the rest of Germanic
-- languages diverge.
>and converges with Celtic
-- there are a limited number of ways they can change. Why does Frisian share
most of the English innovations?
Are Celts prowling the Frisian swamps?
More information about the Indo-european
mailing list