IE /st/ > Etruscan /z/
Eduard Selleslagh
edsel at glo.be
Wed Mar 31 19:25:14 UTC 1999
-----Original Message-----
From: Adolfo Zavaroni <adolfoz at tin.it>
Date: woensdag 31 maart 1999 3:54
>> Adolfo Zavaroni wrote:
>> >I think that Etruscan /z/ in most cases corresponds to IE /st/ both at
>> >the beginning and in the middle of a word.
[ moderator snip ]
>I add that the southern Etr. <s/> (SAN) = northern <s> is a fricative dental
>(likely weaker than /z/). In Raetic too <z> and <s/> mark a fricative.
[ moderator snip of remainder of very long post. Please don't do this. ]
[Ed Selleslagh]
My suggestion, without any pretense:
I think z in Etruscan, certainly when written with Latin characters, was
actually a rendering of Greek zeta, pronounced dz (or maybe ts in certain
contexts) at the time (nowadays it is just English z). So, st > Etruscan z
could be just a metathesis.
Would this be valid?
Ed.
More information about the Indo-european
mailing list