Thoughts On The Lemnos Stele
Ernest P. Moyer
epmoyer at netrax.net
Mon Feb 12 12:44:21 UTC 2001
David:
As I said, if we believe this is a "coincidence" we should be willing to cite
evidence. Clearly, the Naphoth are positively identified in historic
documents. Can you cite evidence for another source?
Why would I reject positive and concrete evidence, while I search for a
nebulous other possible origin. Isn't the better scientific path to investigate
this concrete and specific data?
Ernest
"David L. White" wrote:
>> Clearly this ["naphoth"] is a Semitic word, and not Indo-European.
> I certainly hope I have mis-understood what you are trying to say.
> There is no reason that the same or similar words cannot exist in different
> languages, with totally unrelated meanings. From what you say, it seems
> that the meaning of the word is or was something like 'ridge' (which would
> catch both 'mountain' and 'border'), but there is no reason to connect such
> a word with a word meaning 'nephew' or 'grandson', regardless of similarity
> in sound.
> Dr. David L. White
More information about the Indo-european
mailing list