[Lexicog] question about markers

[Allan Johnson]

Crockett wrote:
>
> I don't know for sure since I don't do interlinearizing, but I would 
> be surprised if TB sees /kaboo/ and /kaboo and happy/ as the same 
> word. I would think TB would see the \se as the same as an \lx. Unless 
> the text actually has the whole phrase /kaboo and happy/, then TB 
> would not think that /kaboo/ was /kaboo and happy/; so only the \ge 
> for kaboo would come up. Does someone know if Kim is right about that?
>
>  
>
I tried it on my computer, and it came out just as Kim described. This 
was using basically just the interlinear Quick Setup. The \ge's from the 
main \lx entry and from the \se subentry were both given as options for 
glossing the \lx. Greg said that adjustments can be made to fix this. 
Does anybody know what adjustments this requires? What needs to be 
adjusted to keep the interlinearizer from looking inside subentries for 
the gloss of an \lx?

Could the problem be related to Toolbox version? I have Toolbox 1.4

Allan J

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listserv.linguistlist.org/pipermail/lexicography/attachments/20080320/25f30c63/attachment.htm>