New York Times: Ain't tht America

Harold Schiffman hfsclpp at
Mon Oct 22 21:35:49 UTC 2007

[image: The New York Times] <>    [image: Printer
Friendly Format Sponsored

October 22, 2007
Ain't That America

Think of America's greatest historical shames. Most have involved the
singling out of groups of people for abuse. Name a distinguishing feature —
skin color, religion, nationality, language — and it's likely that people
here have suffered unjustly for it, either through the freelance hatred of
citizens or as a matter of official government policy. We are heading down
this road again. The country needs to have a working immigration policy, one
that corresponds to economic realities and is based on good sense and
fairness. But it doesn't. It has federal inertia and a rising immigrant
tide, and a national mood of frustration and anxiety that is slipping, as it
has so many times before, into hatred and fear. Hostility for illegal
immigrants falls disproportionately on an entire population of people,
documented or not, who speak Spanish and are working-class or poor. By
blinding the country to solutions, it has harmed us all.

The evidence can be seen in any state or town that has passed
constitutionally dubious laws to deny undocumented immigrants the basics of
living, like housing or the right to gather or to seek work. It's in hot
lines for citizens to turn in neighbors. It's on talk radio and blogs. It's
on the campaign trail, where candidates are pressed to disown moderate
positions. And it can be heard nearly every night on CNN, in the nativist
drumming of Lou Dobbs, for whom immigration is an obsessive cause. In New
York, Gov. Eliot Spitzer has proposed allowing illegal immigrants to earn
driver's licenses. It is a good, practical idea, designed to replace
anonymous drivers with registered competent ones. In show after show, Mr.
Dobbs has trained his biggest guns on Mr. Spitzer, branding him with puerile
epithets like "spoiled, rich-kid brat" and depicting his policy as some sort
of sanctuary program for the 9/11 hijackers. Someday there may be a calm
debate, in Albany and nationally, about immigrant drivers. But with Mr.
Dobbs at the megaphone, for now there is only histrionics and outrage.

Let's concede an indisputable point: people should not be in the country
illegally. But forget about the border for a moment — let's talk about the
12 million who are already here. What should be done about them?

A. Deport them all.

B. Find out who they are. Distinguish between criminals and people who just
want to work. Get them on the books. Make them pay what they owe — not just
the income, Social Security, sales and property taxes they already pay, but
all their taxes, and a fine. Get a smooth legal flow of immigrants going,
and then concentrate on catching and deporting bad people.

C. Catch the few you can, and harass and frighten the rest. Treat the entire
group as a de facto class of criminals, and disrupt or shout down anyone or
any plan seen as abetting their evildoing.

Forget A. Congress tried a version of B, but it was flattened by outrage.

And so here we are at C. It's a policy that can't work; it's too small-bore,
too petty, too narrow. And all the while it's not working, it can only lead
to the festering of hate. Americans are a practical and generous people,
with a tolerant streak a mile wide. But there is a combustible strain of
nativism in this country, and it takes only a handful of match tossers to
ignite it. The new demagogues are united in their zeal to uproot the illegal
population. They do not discriminate between criminals and the much larger
group of ambitious strivers. They champion misguided policies, like a
mythically airtight border fence and a reckless campaign of home invasions.
And they summon the worst of America's past by treating a hidden group of
vulnerable people as an enemy to be hated and vanquished, not as part of a
problem to be managed.

  [image: DCSIMG]

N.b.: Listing on the lgpolicy-list is merely intended as a service to its
and implies neither approval, confirmation nor agreement by the owner or
sponsor of
the list as to the veracity of a message's contents. Members who disagree
with a
message are encouraged to post a rebuttal. (H. Schiffman, Moderator)
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <>

More information about the Lgpolicy-list mailing list