Malaysia: Deputy education minister: Need To Review Policy
hfsclpp at gmail.com
Sun Nov 16 17:51:14 UTC 2008
Ka Seong: Need To Review Policy
News Headline 2008-11-15 15:47
PUTRAJAYA: Deputy education minister Datuk Wee Ka Siong said many
people have been weighing the issue of continuing or discontinuing the
teaching of science and maths in English based on the UPSR model
announced by the education ministry (that more than half of the
candidates have chosen to answer science and maths papers in English).
However he felt this was nothing more than the education officials'
excuse to justify their policy.
"This is a matter of face. These officials cannot admit that the
decision they made under Tun Mahathir's instructions five or six years
ago (to teach science and maths in English) has been wrong."
During an exclusive interview with Sin Chew Daily on Friday, Wee Ka
Siong reiterated that he would try to understand the motive of those
releasing such messages on the policy of teaching science and maths in
English, and with what kind of mentality they have been seeing this
issue. "Many people feel that the recent declaration by the education
department director-general that more and more students have chosen to
answer UPSR science and maths papers in English, is the stepping stone
for the continuation of this policy. "But I don't think the same way.
In fact, I think they're trying to find themselves an excuse to prove
what they've been doing over the past six years has not been totally
On the education ministry's intention to hold a roundtable meeting to
discuss the policy of teaching science and maths in English, he said
the time has not been fixed but it is almost time to come up with a
"It should be December (for a decision). The continuation or
discontinuation of the policy is of utmost importance."
Viewing the policy with optimism
Ka Seong said he was viewing the policy of teaching science and maths
in English with much optimism, adding that education minister Datuk
Seri Hishamudddin is a very pragmatic person.
He said there would be a transitional period after a decision has been
made in December, just like the revision of some textbooks cannot be
carried out at once. However he said it should also not be dragged on
"There are some preparatory works to do, probably one or two months,
but we still can make it, as a new batch of students is coming in."
However he said the ministry would have to consider what to do with
the more senior students, as we cannot simply put an instant stop to
the whole policy without bothering about the others.
Analysing the trends
Wee Ka Siong said the data released by the education department
director-general represented the overall percentage of students
choosing to answer science and maths papers in English from primary
schools of various language streams.
Nevertheless, he has instructed relevant officials to provide the
percentages of students choosing to answer the papers in English,
their mother tongues, or bilingually, from schools of different
He said only by doing so could he see the trends in schools of
different streams, so that he could get a better idea how to answer
questions directed to him at Dewan Rakyat.
He admitted he had been looking at issues from a broader perspective,
and that the ministry needs to take into consideration differing
"Some of the issues have been spotted by the press but not us. They
tell us what they've seen and in this way the education ministry can
move further ahead."
He pointed out that the media had reported that the answers to some
questions in the UPSR Chinese paper were ambiguous, so he summoned the
teachers setting the questions, and proposed to the head of the
examinations board that creative questions should have not been set in
an objective mode, but subjective.
"I'm that kind of person who will say just anything I'm not happy with
in the ministry. I'm very clear where the baseline is and what we
should or should not do.
"I've never taken a day off during these seven months in office!"
5-year average more rational
Ka Siong said it is rational for the ministry to use 5-year average
for the science and maths results for comparison purposes.
He said the point is not the 2% or 3% improvement in exam results, but
the standard of the exams, as the students are different each year and
it is therefore not conclusive to make such comparisons for the
purpose of research. (By CHEN YUZHEN/Translated by DOMINIC LOH/Sin
N.b.: Listing on the lgpolicy-list is merely intended as a service to
and implies neither approval, confirmation nor agreement by the owner
or sponsor of
the list as to the veracity of a message's contents. Members who
disagree with a
message are encouraged to post a rebuttal. (H. Schiffman, Moderator)
More information about the Lgpolicy-list