[lg policy] question for the members of this list

[José David Herazo]

yes, they have been useful.  My perspective about language policy has
broadened thanks to your postings.  Thanks for all that hard work and happy
new year!!

JD

2010/1/2 Harold Schiffman <hfsclpp at gmail.com>

> All:
>
> I have a question that I would like an answer to.  I receive a daily
> "google alert" on the topic of "language policy." This is a service
> I requested of Google, and what they do is search the web for any
> mention of "language" and "policy" in the messages they
> transmit.  They compile a list and forward it to me, and I read the
> messages to see if they are germane to our topic. (Many
> are not--many messages talk about the "language" of a policy, by which
> they mean the wording of the text, not the human
> organ of speech and/or a named variety of language.)
>
> Recently, the google alerts have been turning up bibliographic items
> such as articles or monographs about language policy,
> and I have forwarded some of these to the list.  Nobody has complained
> about this, but I wonder if this is useful to anyone. For example,
> yesterday I forwarded a message about the language policy of the Food
> and Agricultural Organization, a two-line squib mentioning
> which order they list language icons in.  Others have been from
> various jurisdictions in South Africa, which seems to be requiring
> or at least urging people to formulate a language policy, and make it
> known; these have included the Stellenbosch University,
> the government of the Western Cape, and others.  Further examples
> include departments of a Danish university, such as the Engineering
> School.
>
> Since I always tell my students that language policies can be found in
> lots of different nooks and crannies of the world, not just
> the governments of states, but religious organizations, labor unions,
> and other jurisdictions and polities, these are good examples
> of that.  It also reminds us that sometimes a body may have a covert
> policy, i.e. one that assumes that a certain language will
> be "official" but doesn't state it explicitly.  These, of course, get
> no mention.
>
> Anyway, my question is: would you like me to continue to forward these
> "mini-squibs" about language policy, e.g. in the FAO,
> or should I be more judicious?
>
> Thanks, and Happy New Year!
>
> H. Schiffman
>
> --
> **************************************
> N.b.: Listing on the lgpolicy-list is merely intended as a service to
> its members
> and implies neither approval, confirmation nor agreement by the owner
> or sponsor of the list as to the veracity of a message's contents.
> Members who disagree with a message are encouraged to post a rebuttal.
> (H. Schiffman, Moderator)
>
> For more information about the lgpolicy-list, go to
> https://groups.sas.upenn.edu/mailman/
> listinfo/lgpolicy-list
> *******************************************
> _______________________________________________
> This message came to you by way of the lgpolicy-list mailing list
> lgpolicy-list at groups.sas.upenn.edu
> To manage your subscription unsubscribe, or arrange digest format:
> https://groups.sas.upenn.edu/mailman/listinfo/lgpolicy-list
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listserv.linguistlist.org/pipermail/lgpolicy-list/attachments/20100102/36331e58/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
_______________________________________________
This message came to you by way of the lgpolicy-list mailing list
lgpolicy-list at groups.sas.upenn.edu
To manage your subscription unsubscribe, or arrange digest format: https://groups.sas.upenn.edu/mailman/listinfo/lgpolicy-list