[lg policy] Australia: Language policy is labelled a waste

[Harold Schiffman]

Language policy is labelled a waste

Date
    September 6, 2012

Bianca Hall

 ABBOTT'S ambitious goal to have 40 per cent of high school students
study an Asian language within a decade has been branded a
multibillion-dollar waste of money. Four months after Mr Abbott
announced his policy, an analysis prepared by Benjamin Herscovitch
from the Centre for Independent Studies yesterday dubbed the policy an
expensive waste of time. Mr Herscovitch said Australia's multicultural
composition rendered it an Asia-literate country by default.

''Multicultural Australia's diverse composition also means that Asian
cultural literacy [language and a knowledge of culture] is being
acquired by wide sections of Australian society without the government
enacting a policy response of any kind.''
Advertisement

He said an estimated 10 per cent of Australians - or 2.2 million
people - spoke an Asian language at home and this, combined with the
increasing number of couples being of mixed backgrounds, meant
multicultural Australia was mainstream Australia.

Fewer than 6 per cent of secondary students study an Asian language,
and just 12 per cent of high school students study any foreign
languages at year 12. But Mr Herscovitch maintained that English,
rather than being on the wane, remained the world's preferred
language, and the case for Australians to adapt to its region's
languages had not been made.

However, the executive director of the Asia Education Foundation,
Kathe Kirby, branded the report ''selective'' and said businesses were
crying out for a more Asia-literate workforce.

Ms Kirby said Australia needed to transform its business with the
Asian superpowers from an export relationship to trading in services
such as financial services, engineering and marketing.

''Speaking an Asian language isn't just to do with communication; it's
also to do with understanding a culture,'' she said. ''And whilst a
lot of our current trade with the Asian region is export-based, the
future is the export of our services.''

Read more: http://www.theage.com.au/opinion/political-news/language-policy-is-labelled-a-waste-20120905-25evd.html#ixzz25hYtOWsU


-- 
**************************************
N.b.: Listing on the lgpolicy-list is merely intended as a service to
its members
and implies neither approval, confirmation nor agreement by the owner
or sponsor of the list as to the veracity of a message's contents.
Members who disagree with a message are encouraged to post a rebuttal,
and to write directly to the original sender of any offensive message.
 A copy of this may be forwarded to this list as well.  (H. Schiffman,
Moderator)

For more information about the lgpolicy-list, go to
https://groups.sas.upenn.edu/mailman/
listinfo/lgpolicy-list
*******************************************
_______________________________________________
This message came to you by way of the lgpolicy-list mailing list
lgpolicy-list at groups.sas.upenn.edu
To manage your subscription unsubscribe, or arrange digest format: https://groups.sas.upenn.edu/mailman/listinfo/lgpolicy-list