[lg policy] To get our point across, we need to be prudent and "bilingual"

Harold Schiffman hfsclpp at GMAIL.COM
Sat Nov 9 14:48:34 UTC 2013

Learning the languageTo get our point across, we need to be prudent and
"bilingual"By Tim Perry  |  ChristianWeek Columnist

Photo by meddygarnet/Flickr

How do we think scripturally about contemporary issues facing not only the
Canadian Church, but all of Canada? How can Christians make positive
contributions to the common good from our relatively new position on the
social margins? And how does the Bible fit into all this?

We cannot simply move from biblical exegesis to public policy. Evangelicals
would be wise to remember that between exegesis and public debate is an
important step—prudential judgment. That is, an inner working out of how
the sometimes very different horizons of the biblical and contemporary
worlds merge in the process of careful Bible reading and application.
Consider, for example, Jesus' and Paul's teaching on divorce.

In Matthew 19, Jesus gives a straightforward, if difficult, teaching on
divorce: marriage is grounded in the fabric of creation; therefore, no
divorce. Paul, on the other hand, wrestles with applying this teaching in a
community of new converts where, among other things, spouses may wind up
divorced simply because one of them became a Christian (1 Corinthians
7:15). Paul is not contradicting Jesus' or the Early Church's view of
divorce, but tries to apply it in situations that are messy and marred by
sin. He is exercising prudential judgment.

A profound and very helpful example of prudential judgment—the wrestling
with Scripture in contemporary issues—can be found in the teaching of Pope
John Paul II, where he writes about just economic policy, workers' rights,
human sexuality, and many other topics. Whether or not one is inclined to
agree or disagree at the end of reading, the documents reveal a deep
Christian thinker who wants to apply the Scriptures to pressing human and
social problems, but in a way that recognizes that such application is
rarely, if ever, immediate.

Now the next question: How can we contribute to public welfare, the common
good, from a position on the margins? Perhaps the worst thing to do is to
surrender the public square to the loudest voices and focus instead on
evangelism or social action. Those activities are, of course, vital. But
they are no substitute for being present in the public arena, proposing
(and never imposing) thoughtful Christian reflection.

Again, we find a good way forward in the Bible: 2 Kings 18-19. The Jews
have returned to Jerusalem. They are rebuilding their city, their identity,
from the ground up. Part of their challenge was to become conversant in two
languages. The language "outside the wall" was the language of the Aramaic,
the language of the people of the Empire; the language "inside the wall"
was Hebrew. The language of the People of God. To do business, to
negotiate, to live, they had to speak Aramaic. To be formed as God's
people, to worship, and also to live, they had to speak Hebrew.

We are in a fundamentally similar position today. If we are going to make
positive contributions—and not just a milk-toast-rubber-stamp—to the common
good of all citizens of our country, we will need to be ever more fluent in
two languages.

The language of prudential judgment above is the language inside the wall.
It is the language of "the Bible says," the language of exegesis and
application, the language of worship. If we try to speak that language to
those who do not know it, we will do no one any good.

On the other hand, the language of public policy, public debate,
thoughtful, reasoned reflection is the language outside the wall. We need
to learn to speak that language, too. Not to win each public debate, but to
be faithful in every one, win or lose.

The best biblicist—perhaps even one whom history will judge to be the
William Wilberforce of our time—will be prudent and bilingual. He or she
will seek faithfully to understand and apply the Bible, and articulate its
position in a way the wider world may understand, whether possibly to
accept or finally to oppose.

*Tim Perry is rector at Church of the Epiphany in Sudbury, Ontario. He
blogs about theology, religion, politics and sometimes the blues
at texasflood.ca <http://texasflood.ca/>.*


N.b.: Listing on the lgpolicy-list is merely intended as a service to its
and implies neither approval, confirmation nor agreement by the owner or
sponsor of the list as to the veracity of a message's contents. Members who
disagree with a message are encouraged to post a rebuttal, and to write
directly to the original sender of any offensive message.  A copy of this
may be forwarded to this list as well.  (H. Schiffman, Moderator)

For more information about the lgpolicy-list, go to
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listserv.linguistlist.org/pipermail/lgpolicy-list/attachments/20131109/5d363eb0/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
This message came to you by way of the lgpolicy-list mailing list
lgpolicy-list at groups.sas.upenn.edu
To manage your subscription unsubscribe, or arrange digest format: https://groups.sas.upenn.edu/mailman/listinfo/lgpolicy-list

More information about the Lgpolicy-list mailing list