[lg policy] Daniel Ward joins supporters of the Languages for All? initiative in their mission to change the dynamic of world-language education

Sun Nov 24 22:26:42 UTC 2013

 *Daniel Ward* joins supporters of the Languages for All? initiative in
their mission to change the dynamic of world-language education

At the end of September, about 150 professors, business leaders,
researchers, policymakers, and intelligence experts gathered at a one-day
conference at the University of Maryland to discuss how best to act upon
the “Languages For All?” white paper drafted by the university’s director
of language policy initiatives, Dr. Richard Brecht, with Marty Abbott
(ACTFL), Dan E. Davidson (ACIE), William P. Rivers (JNCL-NCLIS), Robert
Slater (ACIE), Amy Weinberg (CASLS-UMD), and Anandini Yoganathan (British
Academy).

The white paper summarizes the current positions as follows: “For decades,
English-speaking countries have wrestled with the question of whether one
language, English, is enough for their citizens. For its part, the U.S. has
not made learning a second language a critical part of its education
system, despite the demands of government and industry as well as the
expectations of the overwhelming majority of parents across the country.”

The intention was to answer the following questions:

• Should the education system in the U.S. provide all children access to
the interpersonal, developmental, and economic benefits of a second
language?

• Are our schools, colleges, and universities capable of making and willing
to make language education universally available? If so, how? If not, why
not?

The paper offers evidence that:

• The demand for languages other than English has dramatically increased
over the past decade, to the extent that the current education system can
now be seen as failing to provide a critical skill to the majority of this
country’s youth.

• Advances in science, technology, and best practices can make universal
access to second languages feasible, but only if:

• scientific breakthroughs are exploited effectively by the formal
education system and by the growing language services industry,

• access to the Internet is universally available, and

• research-based best practices in language education are identified and
promulgated throughout the PK-16 system.
In light of this evidence, the document put forward the following
recommendations, which combine top-down federal interventions and a
bottom-up activism on the part of the “language enterprise,” a convergence
of government, education, private industry, and heritage communities:

• Create a public awareness campaign on the personal and societal benefits,
including national security and economic
competitiveness, of language education.

• Document across the language enterprise, what language learning resources
exist, where they are, and how they can be accessed, together with
standards and assessments that guarantee efficiency and effectiveness for
program outcomes.

• Investigate the barriers at every level of the education system that are
inhibiting the spread of language learning and teaching.

• Develop a research agenda that fills the gaps in evidence regarding
universal access to language education.

• Initiate a national program of dual-language immersions among other
program models demonstrating that learning languages can be effectively and
efficiently integrated into a major part of the
PK-12 system.

Key to the initiative is the recognition that action is required at all
levels — local, state, national, and international — if we are to begin to
provide effective means for all students in English-speaking countries to
gain competence in a second language. The conference was intended to be a
springboard for change so here are some voices to the call.
— *Daniel Ward* is editor of *Language Magazine*.

“This effort, to ask what we ‘can’ do for language rather than the usual
what we ‘should’ do, is an important next step for language in the United
States. Our intent is to work towards building a unified ‘language
enterprise’ in this country, one that focuses on making the case for
‘top-down’ policy as well as ‘bottom-up’ demand for language access for all
Americans. This effort comprises education, government, industry, heritage
communities, and overseas organizations,
including academies from Australia and the United Kingdom, working with our
American Academy of Arts and Sciences.”
— *Richard Brecht*, Director of Language Policy Initiatives, University of
Maryland

“From my perspective, the goal of the Languages for All? initiative is to
reframe the policy and public
conversation about language education in the U.S. This entails developing:
• A coherent set of messages about the role of language as a key component
of 21st-century citizenship and the consequential uses of language for
security, economic wellbeing, and social justice.
• Model policies for state and local school boards.
• Model legislation for national programs to stimulate investment in
language learning.
• A coordinated campaign to enact legislation and influence local
decisions.”
— *Dr. William P. Rivers*, Executive Director of the Joint National
Committee for Language – National Council on Language and International
Studies (JNCL-NCLIS)

“The economic benefits of learning a language are compelling — speaking and
reading Japanese allowed me to have an exciting career in international
business. But employers also value the intangibles that come from studying
a foreign language. There is no better way to learn that people look at the
world differently, and view how to solve a problem differently, than
through studying another language. Problem solving is the most valuable
21st-century skill, and employers recognize the edge that foreign-language
speakers have.”
— *David Bong*, Cofounder of Avant Assessment and its new CEO. Bong has 40
years of experience in domestic and international business management,
sales, and business development. Prior to his founding Avant, a career in
business in Japan gave Bong a strong appreciation for the power of language
to enhance human interaction and build bridges.
“The Languages for All? conference highlighted the remarkable convergence
between the
current situations facing the U.S. and the U.K. The problem is the same:
the lack of people with the command of languages other than English
required to satisfy the needs of business, industry, and government. The
risk is the same: increasing displacement from a multilingual world. The
challenge is the same: to enhance the place of languages and language
teaching within schools and colleges. Moreover, both nations have a large
underexploited capital in the form of many bilingual citizens who are given
neither the opportunity nor the incentive to develop their languages within
the existing education system. The conference also made it clear that the
Australians face many of the same issues, but have been faster off the mark
in addressing them. There is much to be gained from sharing knowledge and
experience across the anglophone countries. In recognition of these shared
issues and concerns, the British Academy, the Australian Academies of the
Social Sciences and Humanities, and the American Academy of Arts and
Sciences have agreed to draw up a Memorandum of Understanding with a view
to collaborating and sharing best practice in our efforts to break what has
been called a ‘vicious circle of monolingualism.’”
— *Professor Nigel Vincent*, Vice-President (Research and Higher Education
Policy), British Academy

http://languagemagazine.com/?page_id=15969

-- 
**************************************
N.b.: Listing on the lgpolicy-list is merely intended as a service to its
members
and implies neither approval, confirmation nor agreement by the owner or
sponsor of the list as to the veracity of a message's contents. Members who
disagree with a message are encouraged to post a rebuttal, and to write
directly to the original sender of any offensive message.  A copy of this
may be forwarded to this list as well.  (H. Schiffman, Moderator)

For more information about the lgpolicy-list, go to
https://groups.sas.upenn.edu/mailman/
listinfo/lgpolicy-list
*******************************************
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listserv.linguistlist.org/pipermail/lgpolicy-list/attachments/20131124/0c20c91e/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
_______________________________________________
This message came to you by way of the lgpolicy-list mailing list
lgpolicy-list at groups.sas.upenn.edu
To manage your subscription unsubscribe, or arrange digest format: https://groups.sas.upenn.edu/mailman/listinfo/lgpolicy-list