[lg policy] India: Hindi is still a thorn in Tamil Nadu's flesh

[Harold Schiffman]

Hindi is still a thorn in Tamil Nadu's fleshSruthisagar Yamunan
    ·   T
<http://www.thehindu.com/sunday-anchor/hindi-and-tamil-nadu/article6689448.ece>
      inShare

   [image: The 1965 anti-Hindi agitation.]
 The Hindu
The 1965 anti-Hindi agitation.
 TOPICS

 But people's animosity towards the language has mellowed over the years

Last week, the political scene in Tamil Nadu saw a churning with the
Marumalarchi Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam, led by Vaiko, walking out of the
National Democratic Alliance.

Among the reasons Mr. Vaiko gave for his decision was “a consistent effort
by the Bharatiya Janata Party-led government to impose the culture of the
North on Tamil Nadu.” In particular was the fear that Tamils would be made
to learn Hindi and Sanskrit through official means, something that hd met
with violent reactions in the 1960s in the State.

When the Centre wanted government departments to use Hindi in social media,
protests erupted immediately in the State. The then Chief Minister,
Jayalalithaa, in a letter to Prime Minister Narendra Modi, said the
decision was against the spirit of the Official Languages Act, 1963.

Perhaps, one of the major reasons the Congress was shunted out of power in
the State in 1967 was imposition of Hindi. The State government brought in
paramilitary forces and clamped down on the anti-Hindi agitators, and the
party never again came to power.

Back in 1937, when the Madras Presidency government led by C.
Rajagopalachari insisted on compulsory learning of Hindi in the State, the
Dravidian movement, then in the form of the Justice Party, got a major
campaign agenda. For three years till the policy was revoked in 1940, the
agitations were sustained in almost every part of the Presidency, in the
process making its leader, E.V. Ramasamy (Periyar), the tallest leader of
the Dravidian movement.

In 1965, when the 15-year time frame to make Hindi the only official
language was about to expire, Tamil Nadu again led the agitations. By this
time, with the Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam (DMK) gaining ground, imposition
of Hindi was part of the narrative of the Aryan-Dravidian divide — the
northern Aryans attempting to invade the cultural space of the southern
Dravidians. It took an assurance from the then Prime Minister, Lal Bahadur
Shastri, that English would continue as the second official language as
long as non-Hindi-speaking people wanted it, to quell the protests.

Political commentators argue that years of agitations against Hindi have
clearly had an impact on the psyche of the people of Tamil Nadu. A common
view is that while the people of the other southern States learn Hindi
along with their native language, those of Tamil Nadu are fanatical about
their language choice, which is a consequence of the larger political
narrative.

However, while Tamil Nadu political parties have consistently opposed the
“imposition” of Hindi, the State’s policy, all through the decades, has
been to make learning of Tamil “compulsory” in schools.

In 2006, the DMK government passed the Tamil Nadu Tamil Learning Act,
through which school students had to compulsorily learn the language from
Class I. The year 2015-16 will be crucial as the first batch which began
learning the language in 2006 will face the Class X public examinations,
making it a test of efficiency of the policy.

But academics feel that with over two decades of globalisation and the
advancement in learning technology, the animosity against Hindi had
mellowed on the ground. So much so that social scientists like C.
Lakshmanan of the Madras Institute of Development Studies feel there is a
growing interest among the people to learn multiple languages.

While he is opposed to the idea of “imposing” a language, Mr. Lakshmanan
says the Tamil Nadu’s government’s policies have made it difficult for
people to get access to other languages.

“Many government schools do not have Hindi teachers. Learning a language
outside the school system is a costly affair. So even if someone is willing
to learn, the system discourages them,” he says.

He says that while the political rhetoric on Tamil has been strong, many
had preferred English to Tamil in education, thus helping themselves join
the mainstream without the need for Hindi. This was sometimes to the
detriment of Tamil.

“But Hindi, spoken widely in the country, is a means to power,” he says. In
that sense, he feels the BJP will gain if it facilitates learning of the
language without imposing it.

Writer A. Marx says politically, the Tamil language issue has ceased to be
an electoral issue, though it continues to be an emotive issue.

In 1965, the DMK was the only face of the anti-Hindi agitations, giving it
the full benefit of the anti-Congress mood. In 2014, all Tamil parties have
a common policy on the language issue, giving no one a clear advantage.

Mr. Marx says the anti-Hindi mood is actually more vigorous in the North
than in the South at the moment. “It is people speaking non-Hindi languages
in the North who have come down heavily on the BJP this time,” he says.

While the Dravidian parties opposed Hindi, he says, they had a logical
language policy nevertheless with the constant emphasis on learning
English, ensuring that Tamils were not left behind in the development story.

http://www.thehindu.com/sunday-anchor/hindi-and-tamil-nadu/article6689448.ece


-- 
**************************************
N.b.: Listing on the lgpolicy-list is merely intended as a service to its
members
and implies neither approval, confirmation nor agreement by the owner or
sponsor of the list as to the veracity of a message's contents. Members who
disagree with a message are encouraged to post a rebuttal, and to write
directly to the original sender of any offensive message.  A copy of this
may be forwarded to this list as well.  (H. Schiffman, Moderator)

For more information about the lgpolicy-list, go to
https://groups.sas.upenn.edu/mailman/
listinfo/lgpolicy-list
*******************************************
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listserv.linguistlist.org/pipermail/lgpolicy-list/attachments/20141214/16aa9e90/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
_______________________________________________
This message came to you by way of the lgpolicy-list mailing list
lgpolicy-list at groups.sas.upenn.edu
To manage your subscription unsubscribe, or arrange digest format: https://groups.sas.upenn.edu/mailman/listinfo/lgpolicy-list