[lg policy] India: Global ambitions in search of language tools

Sun Dec 14 20:46:23 UTC 2014

Global ambitions in search of language tools

   Bageshree S.T.

   M. Veeraraghav

<http://www.thehindu.com/sunday-anchor/karnataka-english-as-medium-of-instruction-in-primary-schools/article6689446.ece#comments>
      inShare
 3
<http://www.thehindu.com/sunday-anchor/karnataka-english-as-medium-of-instruction-in-primary-schools/article6689446.ece#>
  TOPICS
 language <http://www.thehindu.com/tag/language/546/>  English
<http://www.thehindu.com/tag/english/550/>  Kannada
<http://www.thehindu.com/tag/kannada/555/>
 Aspiration for English education seems out of sync with the politics of
linguistic identity

When the aspiration is global, can education for achieving it be enforced
in a language that is local?

Caught at the centre of this question is a battle between private school
managements in Karnataka and the State government.

The debate is over the State’s 1994 language policy, which says the medium
of instruction in primary schools (Classes 1 to 5) should be in the mother
tongue or regional language. Under the policy, permissions were denied for
English-medium primary schools. Private school managements, of course,
challenged the policy in the court.

After a two-decade legal tussle, the policy was quashed by the Supreme
Court on May 6, 2014. Following this, the Karnataka High Court ordered the
State to consider applications of schools to operate with English as the
medium of instruction. But the State has refused to relent and instead
decided to file a curative petition before the Supreme Court.

On the ground, however, imposition of the policy has only made schools
registered as Kannada medium illegally use English as the medium of
instruction. Of the 1,800 schools registered with the Karnataka Unaided
School Managements’ Association, “not a single one actually uses Kannada as
the medium of instruction,” says its lawyer, K.V. Dhananjay.

It seems to be a classic case of aspiration for an English education being
completely out of sync with the politics over asserting the regional
language in a State whose capital city, Bengaluru, has a strong global
connect. This aspiration is, in fact, no longer limited to just Bengaluru
but has percolated to smaller towns as well.

Does that mean the language policy has failed to achieve its purpose? In
many ways, at the individual level, the choice is a language that can cater
to economic and social aspiration, but at the mass level, the issue turns
into “linguistic pride.” Ultimately, the government cannot promise jobs to
the people and even politicians who bat for the language policy send their
children to English-medium schools, says Vikram Sampath, writer and
Executive Director of the Indira Gandhi National Centre of the Arts,
Southern Regional Centre.

However, a substantial section of the intelligentsia and leading Kannada
writers have strongly backed the need for having the mother tongue or the
regional language as the medium of instruction. Their argument is that in
the middle of such a large demand for English, this is the only way Kannada
or any regional language can survive. Jnanpith Award-winner Chandrashekar
Kambar, for instance, initiated an online campaign for a national policy on
the medium of education “to protect and promote all mother tongues of
India.” He argued for a national policy on education that made “a judicious
use of mother tongue-based bilingualism.”

What has puzzled many is why the battle is so virulent in Karnataka. Most
Indian States have seen a push for the regional language, but the battle
over enforcing the mother tongue in primary schools has not lasted so long.

“There is a consistent fear about the shrinking population of Kannada
speakers in Bengaluru city” and that has caused great “insecurity about the
language,” says Professor Sandeep Shastri, political analyst and Pro
Vice-Chancellor of Jain University. Census data say the Kannada-speaking
population in the State’s capital has fallen far below the halfway mark and
stood at 32 per cent. This had heightened fears,” Professor Shastri says.

While States such as Tamil Nadu and Andhra Pradesh have political parties
that are declared custodians of the language, the main forces in Karnataka
are the two national parties. “This means that they will have to appear
sincere on the issue and any compromise could have political
repercussions,” he says.

Ironically, the increasing population of those from around the country in
Bengaluru is exactly the basis for the counter-argument to the language
policy. One question raised is can there be one mother tongue in a city of
such diverse languages.

While educationists and linguists strongly believe that a child learns best
in its mother tongue in the early ages, “the purpose is defeated if it is a
guised imposition of the regional language,” Mr. Sampath says.

One of the practical solutions that can “protect” Kannada while not
enforcing it as the medium of instruction could be introducing it as a
compulsory subject. This is the new thinking in the government as well
following a series of legal defeats. But conceding this may require
enormous political will. A policy that can balance needs that are
political, linguistic and educational, and in the end, benefit both the
child and the language is not easy to arrive at.

http://www.thehindu.com/sunday-anchor/karnataka-english-as-medium-of-instruction-in-primary-schools/article6689446.ece

-- 
**************************************
N.b.: Listing on the lgpolicy-list is merely intended as a service to its
members
and implies neither approval, confirmation nor agreement by the owner or
sponsor of the list as to the veracity of a message's contents. Members who
disagree with a message are encouraged to post a rebuttal, and to write
directly to the original sender of any offensive message.  A copy of this
may be forwarded to this list as well.  (H. Schiffman, Moderator)

For more information about the lgpolicy-list, go to
https://groups.sas.upenn.edu/mailman/
listinfo/lgpolicy-list
*******************************************
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listserv.linguistlist.org/pipermail/lgpolicy-list/attachments/20141214/35603f04/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
_______________________________________________
This message came to you by way of the lgpolicy-list mailing list
lgpolicy-list at groups.sas.upenn.edu
To manage your subscription unsubscribe, or arrange digest format: https://groups.sas.upenn.edu/mailman/listinfo/lgpolicy-list