[lg policy] Pakistan: Call to bring consistency in education policy
hfsclpp at GMAIL.COM
Thu Mar 27 19:54:44 UTC 2014
Call to bring consistency in education policy
March 27, 2014
Arshad Bhatti <http://www.nation.com.pk/Reporter/arshad-bhatti>
LAHORE - Speakers at a policy dialogue titled "English language in
Pakistan today: class, the workplace and the shift in language use"
stressed the need for consistency in education policy to get better
The dialogue was organised by British Council here at a local hotel on
Wednesday. British Council Director English Mussarrat Mashhadi presented
the results of a research conducted by the council on the English teaching.
The focus of this policy dialogue was to engage educationists and language
experts in an interactive discussion that would generate ideas and
recommendations to feed into a more effective language policy.
The research shows that Pakistan is a country where English teaching is
unevenly distributed and very much class based. People who can afford to go
to private institutions have access to better learning material, authentic
learning environments and well trained teachers which all encourage better
English. In comparison poor and lower income families who do not have the
means to send their children to these private expensive schools.
It says the existence of pseudo English medium schools is rampant in the
society. These claim to have English as a medium of instruction but the
entire conversation and communication between the students and the teachers
is in Urdu. English is not taught as a language but rather as a subject,
confined to the 40-minute English class sessions.
The urban-rural divide in the standard of English teaching is very wide.
People in urban settings have much more choice and better quality of
teaching and learning facilities available as compared to the rural areas.
Interestingly, according to the research, 75 percent male teachers in
public schools and 86 per cent male teachers in private schools say that
English should be the medium of education; whereas 83 per cent female
teachers in public schools and 89 percent in private schools say the same.
The dialogue offered rich and purposeful discussions on a range of issues
through keynote speeches, panel discussions, round table discussions and
provided an opportunity to offer opinions and recommendations; bringing
together professionals from the education, media and economic sectors.
Themes discussed at the policy dialogue included a debate on 'Whose English
is it anyway?', Exploring how English is used in advertising through the
subtle shifts from concepts in English to copy in Urdu, whether English
would as important today if Pakistan as an innovative manufacturing base
and other relevant topics.
Talking to The Nation British Council Director Programmes Tony Jones said
exposure for a foreign language was good for children and multilingualism
was common in humans. He said that British Council was keen to raise the
standards of English teaching in Pakistan. He said other than Punjab
government, they were working with KPK government for the purpose.
Furthermore, he said they would also be working with Sindh government soon
for uplift of English teaching standards in the province.
Tony said: "Being in Lahore to discuss the English language in Pakistan
with local experts has been a fascinating experience. May the debate and
all conversations continue". A survey presented on the occasion shows that
acceptability of English is growing in Pakistan as the users of English
language are also growing.
Lahore School of Economics Prof Dr Shahid Sidduiqe said that no language
was weak or strong but it was socio economic factor which make any language
weak or strong. He said language was not only reflection that what was
going on in society but it was considered as life chance - education life
chance, social life chance.
Addressing the audience, Beacon House National University Dean of
Department of Education Dr Tariq Rehman said that "The best policy for
medium of instruction is to teach small children in their mother tongue.
The policy must be for all and not just for government institutions".
N.b.: Listing on the lgpolicy-list is merely intended as a service to its
and implies neither approval, confirmation nor agreement by the owner or
sponsor of the list as to the veracity of a message's contents. Members who
disagree with a message are encouraged to post a rebuttal, and to write
directly to the original sender of any offensive message. A copy of this
may be forwarded to this list as well. (H. Schiffman, Moderator)
For more information about the lgpolicy-list, go to
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
-------------- next part --------------
This message came to you by way of the lgpolicy-list mailing list
lgpolicy-list at groups.sas.upenn.edu
To manage your subscription unsubscribe, or arrange digest format: https://groups.sas.upenn.edu/mailman/listinfo/lgpolicy-list
More information about the Lgpolicy-list