[lg policy] The 'English' debate

Mon Feb 6 16:45:58 UTC 2017

 The ‘English’ debate

February 1, 2017 00:35 AM , Chura Bahadur Thapa
<http://www.myrepublica.com/news/author/1964>
33
SHARES
facebook
<https://www.facebook.com/sharer/sharer.php?u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.myrepublica.com%2Fnews%2F14102&t=My%20Republica%20-%20The%20%E2%80%98English%E2%80%99%20debate>
Twitter
<https://twitter.com/intent/tweet?via=RepublicaNepal&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.myrepublica.com%2Fnews%2F14102&text=My%20Republica%20-%20The%20%E2%80%98English%E2%80%99%20debate>
Google+
<https://plus.google.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.myrepublica.com%2Fnews%2F14102>
[image: The ‘English’ debate]

[image: Chura Bahadur Thapa]
<http://www.myrepublica.com/news/author/1964> Chura
Bahadur Thapa <http://www.myrepublica.com/news/author/1964>

More from Author

   - The ‘English’ debate <http://www.myrepublica.com/news/14102>

<http://www.myrepublica.com/news/14102>

*Three million children in Nepal are now studying in private schools that
market their English medium instruction *
Nepali media is starting to stir up debates on the medium of instruction
(MOI) in schools, which is a positive sign. In this article, I briefly
describe the schooling in Nepal and try to link it up with the language
policy debates. I will also take up the issue of such policies in Hong
Kong, where I currently live and pursue my studies, in order to draw some
meaningful comparisons.

Some people tend to portray Nepali language as mother tongue of all the
people living within the geographic borders of Nepal. On the other hand,
there are also those who tend to believe that speaking or forcing children
to speak a few English words within the confines of school will increase
their English proficiency and lead to their overall academic growth. People
in Nepal seem to be increasingly attracted to the idea of English
education, which has also contributed to accelerated growth of private
schools even in remote parts of the country.

According to Nepali government and other sources, almost three million
children in Nepal are now studying in private schools that market their
English medium instruction (EMI). But there are many unanswered questions,
ranging from English proficiency of teachers, to school and classroom
resources, to teacher expertise, to parental support, to career advancement
of school graduates.

The debates and practices in Hong Kong can be, to some extent, useful
references for Nepal. Contrary to the linguistic and ethnic diversity in
Nepal, Hong Kong is predominantly a monolingual society, with almost 95
percent of its population consisting of Cantonese-speaking Chinese people.
During colonial times, the rulers devised the policies that favored EMI
schooling of students. Such a policy produced anti-colonial localists, who
in turn lobbied for Chinese Medium of Instruction (CMI) in schools.

Before 1997, when Britain formally handed over Hong Kong to China, 98
percent primary schools here used Cantonese as a medium of instruction,
while almost all government schools used English as the medium of
instruction at the secondary level. The end of colonialism in 1997 saw an
immediate change of MOI in schools, when almost ninety percent of the
secondary schools were forced by the government to switch to CMI. However,
middle-class parents resisted post-colonial MOI policy and demanded that
their children be given an opportunity to study in English medium, thereby
forcing the government of Hong Kong to fine-tune its MOI policy in 2009.
This policy gave flexibility to schools to adopt English medium based on
English proficiency of both teachers as well as students. As a result, many
schools in Hong Kong are now teaching one or two classes at the secondary
level in English, or they teach some content-related subjects such as
Mathematics or Science in English. However, teachers wishing to teach in
English medium must either pass a benchmark examination in English language
as specified by the government or score at least Band 6 in IELTS. Without
such qualification, the teacher’s ability to teach in English medium is
considered questionable, with negative consequences for student learning.
There is a mass of literature suggesting that language of instruction in
classroom determines the future of a child. On the other hand, new studies
also suggest that learning in English and developing proficiency in English
as early as possible leads to overall educational development of a child.
This is because without knowledge in English it is increasingly difficult
to build academic and professional expertise, which is also the case in
Nepal. Therefore Nepal’s policymakers need to develop mechanisms to help
its school students make the transition from mother tongue instruction to
English medium instruction.

Hong Kong’s example, again, can be instructive. But Nepal also needs to
come up with its own guidelines on medium of instruction, based on
contextual realities of its schools, parents, students and teachers. It
should then have benchmark examinations for teachers wanting to teach in
English medium (public or private) on one hand, and on the other set a
level of English proficiency for students before they are put into English
medium classrooms. The government should also ensure that schools are able
to put in place adequate resources to support its MOI policy.

The author is a PhD Candidate in linguistics at The University of Hong Kong

churathapa at gmail.com

-- 
**************************************
N.b.: Listing on the lgpolicy-list is merely intended as a service to its
members
and implies neither approval, confirmation nor agreement by the owner or
sponsor of the list as to the veracity of a message's contents. Members who
disagree with a message are encouraged to post a rebuttal, and to write
directly to the original sender of any offensive message.  A copy of this
may be forwarded to this list as well.  (H. Schiffman, Moderator)

For more information about the lgpolicy-list, go to
https://groups.sas.upenn.edu/mailman/
listinfo/lgpolicy-list
*******************************************
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listserv.linguistlist.org/pipermail/lgpolicy-list/attachments/20170206/c234323f/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
_______________________________________________
This message came to you by way of the lgpolicy-list mailing list
lgpolicy-list at groups.sas.upenn.edu
To manage your subscription unsubscribe, or arrange digest format: https://groups.sas.upenn.edu/mailman/listinfo/lgpolicy-list