[lg policy] Patrick Murphy: Irish language needs to be taken out of politics

Sat Feb 18 15:26:16 UTC 2017

[image: Patrick Murphy: Irish language needs to be taken out of
politics] Patrick
Murphy
Patrick Murphy
<http://www.irishnews.com/opinion/columnists/2015/05/26/authors/patrick-murphy-125050/>
18 February, 2017 01:00
Topics

The great strength of the demand for an Irish language act is also its
great weakness: no one knows what it means.

However, shared ignorance has not prevented the sectarian strangling of
what should be an informed debate on language and society.

The argument has arisen because the two nations philosophy in the Good
Friday Agreement portrays Irish as a sectarian symbol on the Catholic side.
So, like parading, the past and even academic selection, a 2,500-year old
language has become another sectarian bone in Stormont's political dogfight.

Sinn Féin presents the case for an Irish language act in terms of equality
(whatever that means). However, Gerry Adams has reportedly said that
equality was designed to "break the bastards" (whoever they are). Irish may
have been broken by centuries of military, political and economic
oppression, but if a language act is designed to break anyone, we would be
better off without it.

Many in the DUP are equally at fault. They mock Irish, because they do not
understand it, which is rather like burning books because you cannot read.
(There is no shame in being unable to read. The real difficulty is in not
recognising the value of reading.)

Sadly, for a party often obsessed with history, the DUP does not apparently
know that up to 1720, half of Ulster's Presbyterians spoke Irish. While
Presbyterianism often fostered Irish, many in the Catholic hierarchy did as
much to suppress the language as the British authorities. For example,
while the Protestant churches translated the bible into Irish in the 17th
century, a complete Catholic version was not published until 1981.

Like those who signed the Good Friday Agreement, many unionists appear
unaware that Presbyterian minister, Rev William Neilson's seminal work, An
Introduction to the Irish Language, was written by a Presbyterian,
dedicated to an Anglican and published by a Catholic.

Irish is not a religion, or a political creed. It has no place in politics
and certainly no role in sectarianism. Like any language, it is just a way
of communicating.

So the only context for rational debate is to remove Irish from what passes
for politics here. (We might reasonably do the same with education.) If
dealing with the 30-year legacy of the Troubles should be vested in an
independent body, the 300-year legacy of the suppression of Irish could be
dealt with in a similar way (perhaps with a Scottish input).

Only a politics-free body can ethically query the reason for an Irish
language act. Is it to prevent Irish from disappearing, to revitalise it,
to fully revive it, or just to allow Irish speakers to access public
services through it?

Whether it is any or all of those, Irish needs a language policy, similar
to the Scottish Bòrd na Gàidhlig's national five year plan. Their current
plan aims to increase the numbers learning, speaking and using Gaelic. We
could comfortably copy that for Irish.

If a language act can be seen as forming the top of a linguistic pyramid,
only a language policy can develop the supporting structure. We cannot
condense a policy into a slogan, particularly one which demands the
undefined.

In any case, legislation for a language is rarely effective on its
own.Eighty years after de Valera made Irish the first official language, a
report by Údaras na Gaeltachta concludes that Irish will no longer be the
primary language in any Gaeltacht community eight years from now.

Economist John Kenneth Galbraith reminds us that in 1845, Irish was the
14th most widely spoken language in Europe. De Valera's legislation a
century later made little difference to the language's decline.

Our first task today is to determine the future legal status of Irish
(certainly post-Brexit). Scots Gaelic has "equal respect" with English,
which is rather vague. In the Arctic, Sámi and Norwegian "are of equal
worth", but only in certain geographical areas.

Irish needs official recognition so we can frame a wider language policy.
It is a challenging task and its cost will influence the policy's scope.
Meanwhile, in the absence of a language policy, demanding road signs in
Irish, for example, is just linguistic flag flying.

Moving the language away from sectarianism and into a shared historical and
linguistic space will not be easy. But there is no future in the current
sectarian arguments.

Their sectarian inter-dependency is captured in the Irish saying, Aithníonn
ciaróg ciaróg eile. It translates as "one beetle recognises another",
suggesting that those of a similar nature (in politics for example) tend to
feed off each other. It is time that the sectarian beetles found somewhere
else to feed.
http://www.irishnews.com/opinion/columnists/2017/02/18/news/patrick-murphy-irish-language-needs-to-be-taken-out-of-politics-934428/

-- 
**************************************
N.b.: Listing on the lgpolicy-list is merely intended as a service to its
members
and implies neither approval, confirmation nor agreement by the owner or
sponsor of the list as to the veracity of a message's contents. Members who
disagree with a message are encouraged to post a rebuttal, and to write
directly to the original sender of any offensive message.  A copy of this
may be forwarded to this list as well.  (H. Schiffman, Moderator)

For more information about the lgpolicy-list, go to
https://groups.sas.upenn.edu/mailman/
listinfo/lgpolicy-list
*******************************************
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listserv.linguistlist.org/pipermail/lgpolicy-list/attachments/20170218/9f39f78d/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
_______________________________________________
This message came to you by way of the lgpolicy-list mailing list
lgpolicy-list at groups.sas.upenn.edu
To manage your subscription unsubscribe, or arrange digest format: https://groups.sas.upenn.edu/mailman/listinfo/lgpolicy-list