Workshop "Differential object marking: theoretical and empirical issues"
Giorgio Iemmolo
giorgio.iemmolo at UNIPV.IT
Tue Aug 18 15:31:22 UTC 2009
Workshop "Differential object marking: theoretical and empirical issues"
to be held Friday August 28, 2009 during the symposium Case in and
across languages (http://www.ling.helsinki.fi/sky/tapahtumat/case/)
organized by SKY (The Linguistic Association of Finland) in Helsinki,
Finland, 27-29 August 2009.
Convenor: Giorgio Iemmolo (University of Pavia)
Scientific Committee:
Sonia Cristofaro (University of Pavia)
Giorgio Iemmolo (University of Pavia)
Silvia Luraghi (University of Pavia)
Fernando Zúñiga (University of Zürich).
*******
TOPICS:
Differential object marking (DOM), i.e. the phenomenon whereby only
some direct objects are (case)-marked depending on their semantic and
pragmatic properties has been studied in detail in the functional-
typological literature (e.g. Bossong 1985, 1998; Comrie 1979, Croft
1988, among others). Properties influencing DOM include animacy,
definiteness, specificity and topicality.
Within the functional-typological literature, two main approaches to
DOM can be identified, the “markedness” approach and the “indexing
approach”. In the markedness approach, advocated for example in Comrie
(1979) and Croft (1988), DOM reflects the marked status of highly
definite and animate direct objects (in the typological sense of the
notion of markedness, as defined e.g. in Croft 2003).
Proponents of the indexing approach have however argued that this
analysis is in contrast with the notion of transitivity as put forward
by Hopper and Thompson (1980), in that a high degree of affectedness
(and, consequently, a high clause transitivity) of the direct objects
directly correlates with a high degree of individuation (Næss 2004,
2007).
DOM has also been studied within generatively oriented theories of
grammar, such as Optimality Theory and Lexical Functional Grammar. For
example, Aissen (2003), Morimoto (2002) and de Swart (2007) try to
provide a systematic account of DOM from an OT-syntax and LFG
approaches, adopting both a markedness and an indexing perspective.
More recently, Nikolaeva & Dalrymple (2007) have proposed a new model
for DOM, suggesting that DOM is a grammatical strategy to mark the
pragmatic role of secondary topic.
Although there are several studies dealing with DOM in individual
languages, such as Spanish (e.g. Pensado 1995, von Heusinger & Kaiser
2003, 2007, among others), Iranian languages (Bossong 1985) and
others, comparatively little attention has been devoted to this
phenomenon in cross-linguistic and diachronic perspective. The aim of
this workshop is to bring together scholars interested in various
aspects of DOM including:
• DOM in individual languages;
• the cross-linguistic distribution and the diachronic evolution of DOM;
• the interplay among the different factors held as relevant for DOM;
• DOM and information structure: does information structure affect the
appearance of DOM?
• DOM and transitivity: are clauses with DOM high in transitivity as
suggested by Hopper and Thompson and Næss, (thus representing the
prototypical transitive clause), or does DOM signal the markedness of
direct objects and, consequently, the transitive clause in which it is
found? Can we consider the direct objects found in prototypical
transitive clauses the prototypical direct objects? What challenges
does this problem present for the theory of case?
********
WORKSHOP WEBSITE: http://lettere.unipv.it/diplinguistica/pagina.php?id=200
********
PROGRAMME:
09.00-09.30 Differential object marking: unity or diversity? - Peter
de Swart (University of Groningen)
09.30-10.00 Formal and functional differences between DOM and DRM. -
Seppo Kittilä (University of Helsinki)
10.00-10.30 Differential argument marking- a crosslinguistic study of
areality. - Kaius Sinnemäki (University of Helsinki)
10.30-10.45 Break
10.45-11.15 Differentially marked topical objects in Komi. - Gerson
Klumpp (Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich)
11.15-11.45 Differential object marking in Burmese.- Mathias Jenny
(University of Zürich)
11.45-13.00 Lunch break
13.00-13.30 Differential object marking in Neo-Aramaic. - Eleanor
Coghill (University of Cambridge)
13.30-14.00 Differential object marking in Balochi and beyond.- Agnes
Korn (University of Frankfurt)
14.00-14.30 Differential object marking in Classical Greek. - Daniel
Riaño Rufilanchas (Universidad Autónoma de Madrid)
14.30-15.00 Coffee break
15.00-15.30 Differential object marking in Eastern Mansi. - Susanna
Virtanen (University of Helsinki)
15.30-16.00 Why differential object marking in Corsican? - Elisabeth
Stark & Kathrin Anne Neuburger (University of Zürich)
16.00-16.30 Discussion and closing words
--
Giorgio Iemmolo
Dipartimento di Linguistica
Università degli Studi di Pavia
Strada Nuova, 65
I- 27100 Pavia, Italy
e-mail: giorgio.iemmolo at unipv.it
http://lettere.unipv.it/diplinguistica/pagina.php?id=169
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listserv.linguistlist.org/pipermail/lingtyp/attachments/20090818/43ea8247/attachment.htm>
More information about the Lingtyp
mailing list