Atkinson on phoneme inventories in Science
Peter Trudgill
peter.trudgill at UNIFR.CH
Tue Apr 19 21:36:52 UTC 2011
Both Pericliev (2004) and, to a lesser extent, Hay & Bauer (2007)
were written in response to my Linguistic Typology paper (Trudgill,
2004a). As I said in my reply to Pericliev, and others who were
invited to contribute to the same issue of Linguistic Typology
(Trudgill, 2004b), my sociolinguistic-typological suggestion was
never that there was any sociolinguistic reason to suppose that there
would be a straightforward relationship between population size and
phoneme inventories. Rather, I proposed a number of social factors
which, I hypothesised, could be expected, in combination, to have
some influence on phoneme inventory size.
These factors are, as I discuss at greater length in Trudgill (2011):
small vs large community size; dense vs loose social networks; large
vs small amounts of communally shared information; high vs low social
stability; and low vs high degree of linguistic contact. Most of
these factors are less readily susceptible to quantification than
community-population size; and so it is not surprising that it is
this latter factor which statistically-minded workers have for the
most part concentrated on and sampled.
In my forthcoming book (Trudgill, 2011), however, I suggest that,
while it is acknowledged that it is important in constructing
linguistic-typological samples to avoid areal and genetic bias, there
is also an insuperable problem of chronological bias. We cannot make
a genuine sample of all of the languages that have ever existed; and
if, as a consideration of the above five sociolinguistic- typological
factors suggests, modern languages are not, as a whole and on
average, typical of how languages have been for most of human
existence, then a representative modern sample will not in fact be
representative.
Peter
Hay, Jennifer and Laurie Bauer. 2007. Phoneme inventory size and
population size. Language 83.388-400.
Pericliev, Vladimir. 2004. There is no correlation between the size
of a community speaking a language and the size of the phonological
inventory of that language. Linguistic Typology 8.376-83.
Trudgill, Peter. 2004a. Linguistic and social typology: the
Austronesian migrations and phoneme inventories. Linguistic Typology
8. 305-320.
Trudgill, Peter. 2004b. On the complexity of simplification.
Linguistic Typology 8. 384-388.
Trudgill, Peter. 2011. Sociolinguistic typology: the social
determinants of linguistic structure and complexity. Oxford: Oxford
University Press
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listserv.linguistlist.org/pipermail/lingtyp/attachments/20110419/43004d3b/attachment.htm>
More information about the Lingtyp
mailing list