[Lingtyp] coordination and predicate negation
Alexander Letuchiy
alexander_letuchiy at hotmail.com
Sat Jun 6 13:33:52 UTC 2015
Dear Matthew,
Thanks!
Sure, I also consider that the reason for English is the presence of the auxiliary. However, what I want is to try to think of it a bit broader: is it true that an English-like situation is never observed in languages without an auxiliary? If yes, what does it tell us of the negation syntax? If no, what is the difference between Russian and some other languages where negation can be expressed once?
From: m.baerman at surrey.ac.uk
To: alexander_letuchiy at hotmail.com
Subject: FW: [Lingtyp] coordination and predicate negation
Date: Sat, 6 Jun 2015 13:18:07 +0000
Hi Sasha
I’m no syntactician, so forgive me for stating the obvious, but I would imagine that the explanation for the English state of affairs is the auxiliary, which
hosts the negation. Since auxiliaries in English can have multiple complements, you can get away with one auxiliary, hence one negation.
best
Matthew
From: Lingtyp [mailto:lingtyp-bounces at listserv.linguistlist.org]
On Behalf Of Alexander Letuchiy
Sent: 06 June 2015 14:47
To: lingtyp at listserv.linguistlist.org
Subject: [Lingtyp] coordination and predicate negation
Dear colleagues,
Are you aware of any linguistic work on coordination in constructions with predicate negation?
One of the questions which I am interested in is why in some languages (English) the negation can be expressed once (1), while in others (Russian) it must be expressed twice (3), while (2)
is ungrammatical:
English:
(1) He does not read books or watch TV.
Russian:
(2) *On ne chitaet knigi i / ili smotrit televizor
he NEG reads books and / or watches TV
Intended: 'He does not read books and / or watch TV'.
(3) On ne chitaet knigi i ne smotrit televizor
he NEG reads books and NEG watches TV
'He does not read books and does not watch TV'.
Thanks a lot in advance,
Sasha Letuchiy, Moscow
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listserv.linguistlist.org/pipermail/lingtyp/attachments/20150606/4d72669a/attachment.htm>
More information about the Lingtyp
mailing list