[Lingtyp] syntactic construction formula
Christian Lehmann
christian.lehmann at uni-erfurt.de
Sun Dec 20 14:56:43 UTC 2020
Ad Martin's proposal:
If I have paired ID and LP rules, this device appears to be sufficient.
If not, then a notation like [NM, V, Adv] does not indicate that V here
has a fixed position, while NM and Adv may swap their position.
In order not to frustrate anybody, I should make it clearer that I had
in mind cases where there is some component C which may occur in
different places in a clause. Thus, I not only have XCY and XYC, but
also CXY and (adding some Z) possibly even more orderings, where XY(Z)
form a rather tight construction, but C may be positioned "anywhere".
This is the case of certain particles in Cabecar. What is a good
construction formula for such a particle? Or may be the combination of
the particle with the simpler construction is not even a "construction"?
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Am 20.12.20 um 13:56 schrieb Martin Haspelmath:
> This problem was addressed in the 1980s by Gazdar and others, under
> the heading of "ID/LP grammars" (e.g. GPSG; see
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ID/LP_grammar).
>
> The Wikipedia article gives an English example of the type "X C Y/X Y C":
>
> /John suddenly screamed / John screamed suddenly./
>
> The proposal here is to have two ID ("immediate dominance") rules,
> where the comma notation shows that nothing is said about the ordering:
>
> S –> NP, VP
> VP –> V, Adv
>
> plus separate LP ("linear precedence") rules, e.g.
>
> NP < VP
> (but not: V < Adv/Adv < V, because either order is possible, and no
> rule is needed)
>
> More generally, I find the following kind of notation fairly
> transparent (where NM stands for "nominal (expression)"):
>
> PP: [P – NM], e.g. "in the house"
> N: [Adj – N – ed], e.g. "blue-eye-d"
> S: [NM, V, Adv], e.g. German "hier wohnt Maria/Maria wohnt hier"
> ('Here lives Maria/Maria lives here')
>
> In other words, a dash signals fixed precedence, while a comma signals
> cooccurrence in a constituent/syntagma without positional entailments.
>
> Martin
>
>
> Am 20.12.20 um 11:23 schrieb Christian Lehmann:
>>
>> Dear all,
>>
>> Guillermo González Campos and I are garnishing our (future) Cabecar
>> grammar with formulas of syntactic structure. Each representation
>> layer (like "structural", "semantic", ...) is one-dimensional. The
>> structural layer involves symbols representing significative
>> components plus indexed brackets. Some constructions comprise a
>> component C which is obligatory, but may occur in different
>> positions. Sometimes a "basic" position may be identified, of which
>> other positions are optional permutations. If so, I can provide a
>> formula for the basic position and add a prose sentence on the
>> variation. Now suppose there is no such basic position. A possibility
>> of representing such a state of affairs is to provide a construction
>> formula for each of the variants, like:
>>
>> X C Y
>>
>> X Y C
>>
>> Rather space-consuming and less than elegant. Is there a notation
>> which allows one to write something like
>>
>> X C Y C
>>
>> to mean that C can and must occupy either of the two positions?
>> (Ordinary parentheses would not work, in my view, as they imply
>> optionality.)
>>
>> Thanks for advice,
>>
>> Christian
>>
>> --
>>
>> Prof. em. Dr. Christian Lehmann
>> Rudolfstr. 4
>> 99092 Erfurt
>> Deutschland
>>
>> Tel.: +49/361/2113417
>> E-Post: christianw_lehmann at arcor.de
>> Web: https://www.christianlehmann.eu
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Lingtyp mailing list
>> Lingtyp at listserv.linguistlist.org
>> http://listserv.linguistlist.org/mailman/listinfo/lingtyp
>
> --
> Martin Haspelmath
> Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology
> Deutscher Platz 6
> D-04103 Leipzig
> https://www.shh.mpg.de/employees/42385/25522
>
> _______________________________________________
> Lingtyp mailing list
> Lingtyp at listserv.linguistlist.org
> http://listserv.linguistlist.org/mailman/listinfo/lingtyp
--
Prof. em. Dr. Christian Lehmann
Rudolfstr. 4
99092 Erfurt
Deutschland
Tel.: +49/361/2113417
E-Post: christianw_lehmann at arcor.de
Web: https://www.christianlehmann.eu
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listserv.linguistlist.org/pipermail/lingtyp/attachments/20201220/2c30cabe/attachment.htm>
More information about the Lingtyp
mailing list