[Lingtyp] ‘hither’ and ‘thither’

[Daniel Ross]

See also Guillaume & Koch (eds.) *Associated Motion* (2021):
https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110692099

Although AM is not strictly (limited to) "(t)hither", it often includes
those ideas, and my chapter and several others compare (deictic)
directionals to AM.

Daniel

On Wed, Dec 29, 2021 at 8:55 AM Yo Matsumoto <yomatsum at ninjal.ac.jp> wrote:

>
> Dear Sergey,
>
> Here are some references.
>
> Devos, ‪Maud, Jenneke van der Wal. 2014. 'COME' and 'GO' off the Beaten
> Grammaticalization Path. Berlin: ‪Walter de Gruyter.
>
> Goddard, Cliff. 1997. The semantics of coming and going. Pragmatics 7:
> 147-162. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.7.2.02god
>
> Matsumoto Y., Akita K., Takahashi K. 2017. The functional nature of
> deictic verbs and the coding patterns of Deixis: An experimental study in
> English, Japanese and Thai. – Ibarretxe-Antuñano I. (ed.). Motion and
> space across languages. Theory and applications. Amsterdam: John Benjamins:
> 95–122.
>
> Nintemann, Julia, Maja Robbers and Nicole Hober. 2020. Here – Hither –
> Hence and Related Categories: A Cross-linguistic Study. Berlin: Mouton de
> Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110672640
> Wälchli, Bernhard. 2006. Come and Go. Deictic and pseudodeictic motion
> verbs. Handout, can be found online.
>
> Wilkins, D., & Hill, D. 1995. When “go” means “come”: Questioning the
> basicness of basic motion verbs. *Cognitive Linguistics*, 6(2/3),
> 209–259. doi: 10.1515/cogl.1995.6.2-3.209
>
> Yo
>
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> Yo Matsumoto
> Professor, NINJAL (National Institute for Japanese Language and
> Linguistics)
> yomatsum at ninjal.ac.jp
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Lingtyp mailing list
> Lingtyp at listserv.linguistlist.org
> http://listserv.linguistlist.org/mailman/listinfo/lingtyp
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listserv.linguistlist.org/pipermail/lingtyp/attachments/20211229/7b0fe26e/attachment.htm>