[Lingtyp] Is the connection between simplicity and intensity universal

Maia Ponsonnet maia.ponsonnet at uwa.edu.au
Sat Jun 5 00:28:05 UTC 2021

Your question is just great :-)!

Get Outlook for Android<https://aka.ms/ghei36>

From: Lingtyp <lingtyp-bounces at listserv.linguistlist.org> on behalf of tangzhengda <tangzhengda at 126.com>
Sent: Saturday, June 5, 2021 8:08:29 AM
To: lingtyp <lingtyp at listserv.linguistlist.org>
Subject: [Lingtyp] Is the connection between simplicity and intensity universal

Dear all,

Words with the lexical meaning of 'with simplicity' are likely to grammaticalize into intensives, or 'intensifiers', e.g. English 'simply', Chinese jianzhi (简直,lit simple and straight), and may be Roman languages also.  It is thus interesting to have the potential to express 'In a plain, homely, or frugal manner', 'inadequately' and 'absolutely, extraordinarily' by the same word.

I wonder if the connection, both synchronical and diachronical, between 'being simple' and 'being intense' somewhat universal?Are there more languages that coincidentally have such intensifier-used lexicons indicating 'simplicity'?

Thanks a lot

With best wishes


Institute of Linguistics, Chinese Academy of Social Sciences,
No.5 Jianguomennei Dajie, Beijing, China; 100732

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listserv.linguistlist.org/pipermail/lingtyp/attachments/20210605/c3794815/attachment.htm>

More information about the Lingtyp mailing list