[Lingtyp] Metaphorical subject-object order in proverbs with parallel sentences
LIU Danqing
liudanq at yahoo.com
Sat Jun 19 02:06:28 UTC 2021
In Chinese, we have both orders. The following proverbs and classic quotations are all of birds as metaphorical objects:
(1) Niao3 zhi1 jiang1 si3, qi2 ming2 ye3 shan4
bird 's will die his/its calling TOP grievous
Ren2 zhi1 jiang1 si3, qi2 yan2 ye3 shan4;
person 's will die his/its speech TOP kind (Confucius' Lunyun)
When a bird is dying, its calling sounds grievous; when a person is dying, his/her speech is kind.
(2) Ren2 wei4 cai2 si3, niao3 wei4 shi2 wang2. person for wealth die bird for food die People die for (seeking) wealth, while birds die for (seeking) food.
(3) Ren2 guo4 liu2 ming2, yan4 guo4 liu2 sheng1.
person pass leave name wild goose pass leave voice
People pass the world leaving their names, while wild geese pass the sky leaving their voice. (its meaning is similar to Ian's first Korean proverb, but with opposed order)
Example (1) is from Confucius's quotation. Generally traditional folk proverbs seem to take the metaphorical subject-object order more often.
On Friday, June 18, 2021, 12:24:36 PM GMT+8, JOO, Ian [Student] <ian.joo at connect.polyu.hk> wrote:
Dear all,
in Korean proverbs consisting of two parallel sentences, the metaphorical object precedes the metaphorical subject:
- 호랑이는 죽어서 가죽을 남기고, 사람은 죽어서 이름을 남긴다. A tiger leaves its hide when it dies, and a person leaves their name when they die.
- 열 길 물 속은 알아도 한 길 사람 속은 모른다. You can see through ten feet deep water, but you cannot see through a one foot deep heart.
In these proverbs, the metaphorical objects (tiger, water) precede the metaphorical subjects (person, heart).
I have been assuming that this is the “natural” way of making a parallel comparison, until I came across Mongolian proverbs today that have the opposite structure:
- Хүн ёс дагана, нохой яс дагана. A person follows traditions, and a dog follows bones.
- Уур биеийг зовоодог, уул морийг зовоодог. The anger torments the body, and the mountain torments the horse.
I assume here that the person and the body are being compared to the dog and the horse (and not the other way around).
Is this metaphorical subject - metaphorical object order common in proverbs of other languages as well?
>From Hong Kong,Ian
Disclaimer:
This message (including any attachments) contains confidential information intended for a specific individual and purpose. If you are not the intended recipient, you should delete this message and notify the sender and The Hong Kong Polytechnic University (the University) immediately. Any disclosure, copying, or distribution of this message, or the taking of any action based on it, is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful.
The University specifically denies any responsibility for the accuracy or quality of information obtained through University E-mail Facilities. Any views and opinions expressed are only those of the author(s) and do not necessarily represent those of the University and the University accepts no liability whatsoever for any losses or damages incurred or caused to any party as a result of the use of such information.
_______________________________________________
Lingtyp mailing list
Lingtyp at listserv.linguistlist.org
http://listserv.linguistlist.org/mailman/listinfo/lingtyp
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listserv.linguistlist.org/pipermail/lingtyp/attachments/20210619/40aa218e/attachment.htm>
More information about the Lingtyp
mailing list