[Lingtyp] Testing a generalization about spatial reference frames

David Gil gil at shh.mpg.de
Fri Mar 5 11:10:54 UTC 2021


Dear all,


Rivers actually provide two alternative and conflicting contexts for the 
interpretation of "left" and "right".  While the assumption underlying 
the Parisian and (I'm guessing) Ukrainian case is that left and right 
are determined in relationship to the *downstream* direction of flow, a 
major river on the island of Sumatra in Indonesia, the Kampar, offers an 
opposite association of left and right.  The Kampar has two large 
tributaries, named "Kampar Kiri" (Kampar left) and "Kampar Kanan" 
(Kampar right). Now the general direction of flow of the river is from 
west to east, but of the two tributaries, Kampar Kiri is further south, 
and Kampar Kanan further north.  I would assume that their names make 
reference to the perspective of a boat travelling *upstream* on the 
united Kampar, reaching the confluence of the two tributaries and having 
to decide which one to take; from the boat's perspective, the choice is 
between left, or Kampar Kiri, and right, or Kampar Kanan.


David




On 05/03/2021 12:41, Maia Ponsonnet wrote:
> of course there is Paris-Rive-Gauche.
> but on the other hand I'd say it's partly lexicalized.
> people much more rarely talk about "rive droite", and I don't think 
> the terminology applies in, says, Lyon with the Rhône for instance?
> Maïa
>
> Dr Maïa Ponsonnet
> Senior Lecturer, Discipline of Linguistics
>
> Graduate Research Coordinator, School of Social Sciences
>
> Building M257, Room 2.36
>
> Faculty of Arts, Business, Law and Education
> The University of Western Australia
> 35 Stirling Hwy, Perth, WA (6009), Australia
> P.  +61 (0) 8 6488 2870 - M.  +61 (0) 468 571 030
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> *From:* Lingtyp <lingtyp-bounces at listserv.linguistlist.org> on behalf 
> of Tilman Berger <tberger at uni-tuebingen.de>
> *Sent:* Friday, 5 March 2021 6:20 PM
> *To:* lingtyp at listserv.linguistlist.org 
> <lingtyp at listserv.linguistlist.org>
> *Subject:* Re: [Lingtyp] Testing a generalization about spatial 
> reference frames
>
> Dear all,
>
> I would like to support this point, that "left" and "right" can be 
> lexicalized toponyms. There is the distinction of "Left-bank Ukraine" 
> (Лівобережна Україна) and "Right-bank Ukraine" (Правобережна Україна), 
> where "left" means the western bank and "right" the eastern. These 
> terms have been in use since the 17th century.
>
> Best wishes
>
> Tilman
>
>
> Am 05.03.21 um 11:05 schrieb David Gil:
>>
>> Dear all,
>>
>> Relative terms making reference to "left" or "right" may also be 
>> lexicalized to form toponyms.  For example, the country name Yemen is 
>> actually a lexicalization of the Arabic word for "right", drawing 
>> upon an canonical orientation facing the rising sun to the east.
>>
>> David
>>
>>
>> On 05/03/2021 10:36, Dmitry Nikolaev wrote:
>>> Dear Juergen,
>>>
>>> I don't know what level of conventionalisation you are looking for, 
>>> but speakers of Russian, at least those who grew up in large cities, 
>>> tend in general to avoid using geocentric terms and feel 
>>> uncomfortable using them, and if it is at all possible to say "The 
>>> lake is to the right of the hill", I would personally do so. A quick 
>>> googling showed that this phraseology is quite frequent in route 
>>> descriptions, and this YouTube video literally advertises a plot of 
>>> land "to the left of lake Veselovka".
>>>
>>> My best,
>>> Dmitry
>>>
>>> On Fri, 5 Mar 2021 at 07:26, Bohnemeyer, Juergen <jb77 at buffalo.edu 
>>> <mailto:jb77 at buffalo.edu>> wrote:
>>>
>>>     Dear all — I’d like to solicit your help with a generalization.
>>>     I’m wondering whether anybody is aware of a counterexample:
>>>
>>>     It is well known that there are communities whose members
>>>     regularly use geocentric terms in reference to the speaker’s own
>>>     body, as in
>>>
>>>     (1) ‘My western/downhill arm hurts’.
>>>
>>>     E.g., Laughren (1978) mentions this phenomenon in reference to
>>>     Warlpiri. Levinson (2003: 4) notes that the practice exists
>>>     among speakers of Guugu Yimithirr (Pama-Nyungan, Queensland).
>>>     Haun & Rapold (2011) present an experimental study of the
>>>     practice with speakers of ≠Akhoe Hai||om (Khoekhoe, Namibia).
>>>
>>>     Now, I’m interested in what you might consider something of an
>>>     inverse of this kind of use: the use of relative frames at the
>>>     geographic scale, as in
>>>
>>>     (2) ‘The lake is to the right of the hill’
>>>
>>>     My generalization is that there doesn’t seem to be any community
>>>     in which the type of use exemplified by (2) is conventional.
>>>
>>>     That is to say, of course we can easily imagine situations in
>>>     which English speakers might exchange something like (2):
>>>
>>>     * A speaker looking at the lake and hill might use (2) to
>>>     describe what she sees to an interlocutor who doesn’t have
>>>     visual access to the scene. The speaker might use relative
>>>     language in this case in order to produce a vivid image of the
>>>     scene as it presents itself to her.
>>>
>>>     * A speaker looking at representations of the hill and lake on a
>>>     map might use (2) metonymically.
>>>
>>>     However, I’m unaware of a community in which something like (2)
>>>     would be a conventional way of locating landscape entities with
>>>     respect to one another in the absence of visual access to
>>>     (representations of) them.
>>>
>>>     (One could argue that (2) is pragmatically semi-infelicitous in
>>>     such a context since the truth of (2) depends on the location of
>>>     the observer, which is usually more variable than that of the
>>>     hill and lake. However, even though the truth of (1) similarly
>>>     changes with the speaker’s orientation, it is presumed to be an
>>>     entrenched strategy for this context in several cultures. My
>>>     interest is partly in this asymmetry.)
>>>
>>>     I’m curious whether people are aware of counterexamples.
>>>
>>>     Thanks! — Juergen
>>>
>>>     Haun, D. M. B. & C. J. Rapold. (2011). Variation in memory for
>>>     body movements across cultures. Current Biology 19(23): R1068-1069.
>>>
>>>     Laughren,M. (1978). Directional terminology in Warlpiri. in Th.
>>>     Le and M. McCausland (eds.), Working papers in language and
>>>     linguistics, 8: 1–16. Launceston: Tasmanian College of Advanced
>>>     Education.
>>>
>>>     Levinson, S. C. (2003). Space in language and cognition.
>>>     Cambridge: CUP.
>>>
>>>     -- 
>>>     Juergen Bohnemeyer (He/Him)
>>>     Professor, Department of Linguistics
>>>     University at Buffalo
>>>
>>>     Office: 642 Baldy Hall, UB North Campus
>>>     Mailing address: 609 Baldy Hall, Buffalo, NY 14260
>>>     Phone: (716) 645 0127
>>>     Fax: (716) 645 3825
>>>     Email: jb77 at buffalo.edu <mailto:jb77 at buffalo.edu>
>>>     Web: http://www.acsu.buffalo.edu/~jb77/
>>>     <http://www.acsu.buffalo.edu/~jb77/>
>>>
>>>     Office hours will be held by Zoom. Email me to schedule a call
>>>     at any time. I will in addition hold Tu/Th 4-5pm open
>>>     specifically for remote office hours.
>>>
>>>     There’s A Crack In Everything - That’s How The Light Gets In
>>>     (Leonard Cohen)
>>>
>>>     _______________________________________________
>>>     Lingtyp mailing list
>>>     Lingtyp at listserv.linguistlist.org
>>>     <mailto:Lingtyp at listserv.linguistlist.org>
>>>     http://listserv.linguistlist.org/mailman/listinfo/lingtyp
>>>     <http://listserv.linguistlist.org/mailman/listinfo/lingtyp>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Lingtyp mailing list
>>> Lingtyp at listserv.linguistlist.org  <mailto:Lingtyp at listserv.linguistlist.org>
>>> http://listserv.linguistlist.org/mailman/listinfo/lingtyp  <http://listserv.linguistlist.org/mailman/listinfo/lingtyp>
>> -- 
>> David Gil
>>   
>> Senior Scientist (Associate)
>> Department of Linguistic and Cultural Evolution
>> Max Planck Institute for the Science of Human History
>> Kahlaische Strasse 10, 07745 Jena, Germany
>>   
>> Email:gil at shh.mpg.de  <mailto:gil at shh.mpg.de>
>> Mobile Phone (Israel): +972-526117713
>> Mobile Phone (Indonesia): +62-81344082091
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Lingtyp mailing list
>> Lingtyp at listserv.linguistlist.org  <mailto:Lingtyp at listserv.linguistlist.org>
>> http://listserv.linguistlist.org/mailman/listinfo/lingtyp  <http://listserv.linguistlist.org/mailman/listinfo/lingtyp>
> -- 
> Tilman Berger
> Slavisches Seminar
> Universitaet Tuebingen
> Wilhelmstr. 50
> D-72074 Tuebingen
>
> E-Mail:tberger at uni-tuebingen.de  <mailto:tberger at uni-tuebingen.de>
> Homepage:https://uni-tuebingen.de/de/135724  <https://uni-tuebingen.de/de/135724>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Lingtyp mailing list
> Lingtyp at listserv.linguistlist.org
> http://listserv.linguistlist.org/mailman/listinfo/lingtyp

-- 
David Gil
  
Senior Scientist (Associate)
Department of Linguistic and Cultural Evolution
Max Planck Institute for the Science of Human History
Kahlaische Strasse 10, 07745 Jena, Germany
  
Email: gil at shh.mpg.de
Mobile Phone (Israel): +972-526117713
Mobile Phone (Indonesia): +62-81344082091

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listserv.linguistlist.org/pipermail/lingtyp/attachments/20210305/675dc02b/attachment.htm>


More information about the Lingtyp mailing list