[Lingtyp] terminological question about intransitive verbs
Christian Lehmann
christian.lehmann at uni-erfurt.de
Wed May 12 10:24:59 UTC 2021
The only or direct actant of an intransitive verb may be its actor
(/run/) or its undergoer (/die/). This may be taken to be a feature of
the verb's valency. There are then two valency classes of intransitive
verbs. I know of the following terms for these:
active - inactive (Klimov)
agentive - non-agentive
unergative - unaccusative (Perlmutter)
All of these pairs have terminological or conceptual problems (which I
can name if desired). I have therefore been looking for better terms. I
had called them
actor-oriented - undergoer-oriented.
However, I need the term 'oriented' in verbal grammar in a different
sense, so I have to replace these. Currently, I call them
actor-holding - undergoer-holding
Not particularly elegant, are they?
Are there good terms on the linguistic market (of the past two
centuries) for what is meant by the above? Or failing this, brilliant
neologisms?
Grateful for suggestions,
Christian
--
Prof. em. Dr. Christian Lehmann
Rudolfstr. 4
99092 Erfurt
Deutschland
Tel.: +49/361/2113417
E-Post: christianw_lehmann at arcor.de
Web: https://www.christianlehmann.eu
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listserv.linguistlist.org/pipermail/lingtyp/attachments/20210512/9f256a68/attachment.htm>
More information about the Lingtyp
mailing list