[Lingtyp] semantic role of participant that needs something
christian.lehmann at uni-erfurt.de
Sat Jul 2 11:22:19 UTC 2022
Volker is right that 'X needs Y' does not imply 'X does not have Y'; at
least not in English, German and Cabecar. Cabecar has a close synonym to
'be needed' and with the same valency frame, viz. 'be missed'; and this
does imply 'lack'.
Then the question remains what 'need' (in the sense of the three
languages mentioned) means. I am not sure that modality is involved. Do
you need a modal notion to describe the second clause of 'I can't lend
you my computer, I need it' ? Moreover, 'in the best of all worlds' is,
of course, a handy paraphrase which does not directly map onto a more
formal semantic representation.
'X needs Y' appears to mean 'if X does not have Y, it is bad for X'. Not
sure whether this would imply 'if X has Y, it is good for X', or if this
would correspond well to the meaning of 'X needs Y'.
If so, this meaning involves an evaluation. I thought that the
benefactive/malefactive roles (incidentally, I think appropriate terms
are 'beneficiary/maleficiary') are essentially characterized by this
evaluative relation. Of course, a relation between the participant and
the situation, not between the speaker and the situation.
Prof. em. Dr. Christian Lehmann
E-Post: christianw_lehmann at arcor.de
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Lingtyp