[Lingtyp] Evidentiality, gatekeeping, arguments to authority

Wed Dec 6 15:29:29 UTC 2023

Hello,

I have to say that I also felt uncomfortable with your tone Sasha, and I believe it is probably better to engage in collegial discussion than public condemnation.

This said, having worked with smaller communities in Australia, I have also experienced, occasionally, that the use made of published data was not fair to a speakers' community. These questions are considerably more complicated where linguists work with speakers of languages who are struggling with colonial oppression.

There are lots of discussions on how to manage consent for the use of data across time.

They are all very complicated and plagued with misunderstandings.

Whatever answers we wish to give in the end, I don't think these difficult questions can be brushed off simply by claiming the use of any accessible data for the sake of science as soon as it has entered the "scientific arena", so to speak.

I suppose this was implied in your suggestions Kate (which I very much agree with), but I thought is may be good to make it even more explicit.

Cheers and kind regards to all,

Maïa

Maïa Ponsonnet

Chargée de Recherche HDR @ CNRS Dynamique Du Langage

14, avenue Berthelot, 69007 Lyon, FRANCE  -- +33 4 72 72 65 46

Adjunct @ University of Western Australia

+ + + + +

Co-rédactrice en chef du Journal de la Société des Océanistes

https://journals.openedition.org/jso/

________________________________
De : Lingtyp <lingtyp-bounces at listserv.linguistlist.org> de la part de Kate Lindsey <klindsey at bu.edu>
Envoyé : mercredi 6 décembre 2023 15:52
À : Sebastian Nordhoff
Cc : lingtyp at listserv.linguistlist.org
Objet : Re: [Lingtyp] Evidentiality, gatekeeping, arguments to authority

Dear all,

I have also been in the position where a colleague has re-interpreted an analysis of mine based on only the subset of data that I managed to publish and not the overwhelming data that a linguistic community or indeed an invested data collector may hold. In fact, I imagine that's true for many of us on this list who have done any amount of fieldwork.

As humbling as it is to witness someone engaging in our work in this less than optimal way, the answer is clearly not to demean them publicly and shoo them out of the room. If we want others to engage with our language data better, there are several more productive things we can do:

1. Make larger sets of data open access both in raw and annotated formats.
2. Publish guides so that others know how to interpret our data collections.
3. Provide consultations with researchers seeking to understand our data collections.
4. Establish and adhere to data management/annotation standards to the extent possible so that data can be compared.
5. Connect our publications to curated datasets so that readers can see more data than is allowed in word-limited abstracts, papers, and books.

This is a lot of work, and is often skipped due to the fact that (1) our field has not historically acknowledged the importance of this kind of data shepherding, (2) this work is best carried out by a team and not just one person, which requires funding, and (3) certain linguists are unwilling to make their raw data accessible.

Clearly we need systemic changes to support training, funding, and promotion for work in these areas (and many are working towards these goals already!), but the kind of gatekeeping displayed here goes against these efforts by shutting down communication where it is needed most. Those who willingly misinterpret or hoard data/analyses will be recognized, and may even make it easy for us by self-identifying in public spaces.

Kate

On Wed, Dec 6, 2023 at 5:24 AM Sebastian Nordhoff <sebastian.nordhoff at glottotopia.de<mailto:sebastian.nordhoff at glottotopia.de>> wrote:
Dear all,
I would like to second Jocelyn's remarks.
Prof. Aikhenvalds position is basically that analyses based on 30 years
of fieldwork cannot be challenged or amended by researchers who do not
have that amount of experience.
Sorry, this is gatekeeping and antithetic to science. If Marius Zemp's
analyses are wrong or mistaken, these will be filtered out by the
scientific method, but not by ad hominem or by arguments to authority.
How feeble is it to put scare quotes around names, and to put question
marks after the name of a colleague. My respect for you, Prof.
Aikhenvald, has plummeted.
Best wishes
Sebastian

On 12/6/23 11:00, Jocelyn Aznar wrote:
> Dear everyone,
>
> I hope this message finds you well. I would like to address Prof.
> Aikhenvald's recent contribution to our discussion list. It's the first
> time I've encountered such a message on the list, and I believe it's
> important to respond in order to maintain the collegial spirit of our
> exchanges.
>
> Her message, which contained many ad personam attacks, is rude and
> unfair. Such behavior goes against the collaborative atmosphere we have
> on this list. Furthermore, I fully align with Marius Zemp's observation
> that her message challenges a "basic principle of social science that
> any data published are there for linguists to discuss and reanalyze."
>
> In the interest of constructive dialogue, if Prof. Aikhenvald disagrees
> with Marius Zemp's analysis, a more productive response would involve
> engaging in a counter linguistic discussion. This approach aligns with
> the principles of open academic discourse and encourages a more positive
> and productive exchange of ideas.
>
> Best regards,
> Jocelyn Aznar
> from Bern
>
> Le 04/12/2023 à 11:20, Alexandra Aikhenvald a écrit :
>> Dear colleagues and friends
>>
>> I would like to share with you two recent papers on mine, dealing with
>> evidentiality, including the expression of shared information source
>> across languages, and a new approach to the multifaceted semantics of
>> evidentials. In the most recent paper, ‘Speaking about knowledge’, you
>> will see a discussion of the interaction between evidentiality,
>> egophoricity, and mirativity which may lead to a new take on semantic
>> typology of evidentials (a continuation of what has been done within
>> the /Oxford Handbook of evidentiality, /now coming out in paperback
>> with some corrections, later this year).
>>
>> A note is in order.
>>
>> All the information on Tariana - an endangered and yet vital Arawak
>> language of North-west Amazonia, Brazil - is based on immersion
>> fieldwork with the speakers of Tariana, over the past 30 years or so.
>> The analysis in all my work (including the 2003 grammar, the Oxford
>> Handbook, and umpteen other papers) is based on fieldwork, careful
>> analysos and also on speakers’ intuitions, comments, and our discussions.
>>
>> An unfortunate incident has been recently brought to my attention.
>> Someone by the name of 'Zemp' (currently at the University of Bern?),
>> has been making quasi-typological pronouncements, spuriously and
>> gratuitously misinterpreting the Tariana markers of visual
>> evidentiality as something else. Naturally, his work does not make
>> sense (see attached, for instance). Zemp does not know the first thing
>> about the language - which is obvious from his 'typologies'.
>>
>>
>> We, grammar analysts, are no strangers to spurious re-interpretations
>> by those who have little understanding of the languages they dare
>> ‘reinterpret’ and even less of linguistic typology. However, such
>> misinterpretations are worrying and upsetting for all, including the
>> speakers themselves. If Zemp has any vestiges of honesty, he will make
>> a public apology to the Tariana Nation.
>>
>>   Best wishes
>>
>> Sacha
>>
>> Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald, PhD, DLitt, FAHA, FQAAS, MAE
>>
>> Professorial Research Fellow and Australian Laureate Fellow
>>
>> Jawun Centre (formerly Centre for Indigenous Health Equity Research),
>> Central Queensland University
>>
>> Cairns, Queensland, Australia
>>
>> Foundation Director of the Language and Culture Research Centre (JCU)
>>
>> Consultant, OED (South American languages)
>>
>> phone 61-400305315
>>
>> http://www.aikhenvaldlinguistics.com/
>> <http://www.aikhenvaldlinguistics.com/>;
>>
>> https://staff-profiles.cqu.edu.au/home/view/25682
>> <https://mcas-proxyweb.mcas.ms/certificate-checker?login=false&originalUrl=https%3A%2F%2Fstaff-profiles.cqu.edu.au.mcas.ms%2Fhome%2Fview%2F25682%3FMcasTsid%3D20893>
>>
>> https://researchonline.jcu.edu.au/view/all/ADD43F35E4ED54959A3F28C152248725.html <https://researchonline.jcu.edu.au/view/all/ADD43F35E4ED54959A3F28C152248725.html>
>>
>> https://www.ae-info.org/ae/Member/Aikhenvald_Alexandra
>> <https://www.ae-info.org/ae/Member/Aikhenvald_Alexandra>alternative
>> e-mail: a.aikhenvald at cqu.edu.au<mailto:a.aikhenvald at cqu.edu.au>, nyamamayratakw at gmail.com<mailto:nyamamayratakw at gmail.com>,
>> goldagorb at yahoo.com<mailto:goldagorb at yahoo.com>
>>
>> *Serial Verbs* *The Oxford Handbook of Evidentiality*
>>
>> By *Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald Edited By* *Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald*
>>
>> Now available from Oxford University Press
>> <https://global.oup.com/academic/product/serial-verbs-9780198791263?cc=au&lang=en&>Now available from Oxford University Press <https://global.oup.com/academic/product/the-oxford-handbook-of-evidentiality-9780198759515?cc=au&lang=en&>
>>
>> Sig1
>> <https://global.oup.com/academic/product/serial-verbs-9780198791263?cc=au&lang=en&>Sig2 <https://global.oup.com/academic/product/the-oxford-handbook-of-evidentiality-9780198759515?cc=au&lang=en&>
>>
>> My new book is https://profilebooks.com/work/i-saw-the-dog
>> <https://profilebooks.com/work/i-saw-the-dog/>.
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Lingtyp mailing list
>> Lingtyp at listserv.linguistlist.org<mailto:Lingtyp at listserv.linguistlist.org>
>> https://listserv.linguistlist.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lingtyp
> _______________________________________________
> Lingtyp mailing list
> Lingtyp at listserv.linguistlist.org<mailto:Lingtyp at listserv.linguistlist.org>
> https://listserv.linguistlist.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lingtyp
_______________________________________________
Lingtyp mailing list
Lingtyp at listserv.linguistlist.org<mailto:Lingtyp at listserv.linguistlist.org>
https://listserv.linguistlist.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lingtyp
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listserv.linguistlist.org/pipermail/lingtyp/attachments/20231206/8527f501/attachment.htm>