[Lingtyp] base valency classes of verb roots

[Paolo Ramat]

Dear Christian ,

*iff * suffixes are present only in a verbal subclass (your 2a and b) why
not use the morphological terminology and call the subclass 'suffixed' vs.
the unsuffixed (or 'not-suffixed') one ?
Have a nice, happy New Year !
Paolo

Prof. Dr. Paolo Ramat
Accademia Nazionale dei Lincei, Socio corrispondente
'Academia Europaea'
'Societas Linguistica Europaea', Honorary Member
Università di Pavia (retired)
Istituto Universitario di Studi Superiori (IUSS Pavia) (retired)

piazzetta Arduino 11 - I 27100 Pavia
##39 0382 27027
347 044 98 44


Il giorno mer 27 dic 2023 alle ore 13:05 Christian Lehmann <
christian.lehmann at uni-erfurt.de> ha scritto:

> Dear colleagues,
>
> sorry for my exaggerated preoccupation with adequate terminology. I have
> to name the Cabecar (Chibchan) verb root classes, but am short of
> linguistic terms. Verbs form voice stems for conjugation in active and
> middle voice. Middle voice involves a suffix for all verbs; active voice
> involves a suffix in one root class.
>
> The criteria of the classification are:
> - Does the root have an active voice? If not, it is a medial root (a
> Classicist would call it *deponens*).
> - Does the active voice stem involve a suffix (viz. the causativizer)? If
> not, I call the root preliminarily 'directed'.
> - Is the root transitive or intransitive in active voice?
>
> These are the classes:
>     1. Directed roots: these directly conjugate in active voice:
>         a. intransitive roots: in active voice, the verb is intransitive
> (e.g. 'laugh');
>         b. transitive roots: in active voice, the verb is transitive (e.g.
> 'bend').
>     2. Undirected roots: these do not directly conjugate in active voice:
>         a. medial roots: these only conjugate in the middle voice, and the
> valency of this voice stem is intransitive (e.g. 'stay');
>         b. ambivalent roots: these alternatively take on the middle voice
> suffix and then are intransitive, or they take on the causativizer and then
> are transitive (e.g. 'melt').
>
> These four classes work satisfactorily. What I am unhappy with is the
> names 'directed', 'undirected' and 'ambivalent'. The idea underlying
> 'directed - undirected' is that undirected verb roots have no base valency;
> this is, instead, conferred to them by the voice suffix. The idea behind
> 'ambivalent' is that these roots have either valency depending on the voice
> suffix that they are provided with.
>
> I would prefer 'oriented - non-oriented' to 'directed - nondirected'; but
> this term pair is taken by the contrast between verbal constructions of the
> sort (English examples:) *actor/who acts* vs. *action/that he acts*. And
> 'ambivalent' is a very ambivalent term; a more specific one (like
> 'Janus-headed') may be more mnemonic.
>
> Have you seen appropriate term (pair)s in grammars? Or can you think of
> terms that would fit?
>
> Many thanks in advance,
> Christian
> --
>
> Prof. em. Dr. Christian Lehmann
> Rudolfstr. 4
> 99092 Erfurt
> Deutschland
> Tel.: +49/361/2113417
> E-Post: christianw_lehmann at arcor.de
> Web: https://www.christianlehmann.eu
> _______________________________________________
> Lingtyp mailing list
> Lingtyp at listserv.linguistlist.org
> https://listserv.linguistlist.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lingtyp
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listserv.linguistlist.org/pipermail/lingtyp/attachments/20231227/6024d92a/attachment.htm>