[Lingtyp] query: comparative constructions
周晨磊
zhouchenlei at 126.com
Tue Feb 14 22:15:00 UTC 2023
Dear all,
I would like to ask you about two phenomena of the comparative construction. The first is the separation between the "comparative subject" (ComS) and the "attribute subject" (AttS), which can be seen in Mandarin Chinese:
(1) daxiang bizi bi qita dongwu chang
elephant nose than other animals long
ComS AttS Compr St Adj
'The elephant's nose is longer than other animals'
(2) jiage women bi nimen gui.
price we than you expensive
AttS ComS Compr St Adj
'Our price is more expensive than yours.'
The AttS is the argument of the Adj, whereas the ComS-Adj is unacceptable (e.g., 'elephant long' is not what (1) expresses, but 'nose long' ).
I am curious if such expressions are allowed in other languages, especially in languages with the "double-subject construction" such as Japanese and Korean. As far as I know, both "elephant nose long" and "price we expensive" should be valid in those languages. However, I do not know whether this double-subject construction is allowed in a comparative construction, like (1)-(2).
The second phenonema is about the separation between what I termed as "abstract measurement" and "concrete measurement" of the Adj. I found this distinction in Zhoutun, a Chinese variety that is hugely influenced by Amdo Tibetan. Zhoutun distinguishes the two types of measurement in terms of the position:
(3) a. This that than three meterstaller. 'This is three meters taller than that.'
b. This that than tallermuch. 'This is much taller than that.'
In (3), whereas the concrete measurement "three meters" precedes the Adj in (3a), the abstract measurement "much" follows the Adj in (3b). I am curious if analogous cases exist in other languages. Any leads or insights would be appreciated!
Best wishes,
Chenlei
--
Zhou, Chenlei
Dept. of Syntax & Semantics,
Institute of Linguistics,
Chinese Academy of Social Sciences
#5 Jianguomennei Street, Beijing, 100732, P.R.China
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listserv.linguistlist.org/pipermail/lingtyp/attachments/20230215/125fb484/attachment.htm>
More information about the Lingtyp
mailing list