[Lingtyp] from connector to focus marker
Eitan Grossman
eitan.grossman at mail.huji.ac.il
Mon Feb 20 05:46:32 UTC 2023
Hi all,
>
> Whether an erstwhile relative clause subordinator can attach itself to the
> focus constituent as a cleft is reinterpreted as a mono-clausal focus
> construction strikes me an empirical question. I’m not personally aware of
> a case in which this happened, but I certainly don’t see an a-priori reason
> why it couldn’t happen.
>
>
This seems to be what happened in Ancient Egyptian-Coptic (Afroasiatic),
where a prefix associated with relativization became a verbal prefix
associated with focus. In the following example, it is the past relative
prefix nt- that is relevant.
*nt-a-u-r-šmmo erô-tn etbe-neu-hbêue
ethoou*
foc-pst-3pl-do-stranger to-2pl because-poss.pl.3pl-deeds rel-evil
‘It is *because of their evil deeds* that they have become strangers to
you.’
The diachronic story is complicated, but two things do stand out: (1) the
prefixes associated with focus constructions did develop out of
relativizers/nominalzers in cleft sentence constructions, (2)
synchronically, the construction is not easily analyzed as a biclausal
cleft anymore. For discussion, examples, and references, see an old handout
here
<https://www2.hu-berlin.de/predicate_focus_africa/data/2014-06-24_Grossmann_PCF.in.Coptic.pdf>
and
for more on how it became a prefix, here
<https://www.researchgate.net/publication/331705561_Swimming_against_the_typological_tide_or_paddling_along_with_language_change_Dispreferred_structures_and_diachronic_biases_in_affix_ordering#fullTextFileContent>
.
Eitan
>
> University at Buffalo
>
> Office: 642 Baldy Hall, UB North Campus
> Mailing address: 609 Baldy Hall, Buffalo, NY 14260
> Phone: (716) 645 0127
> Fax: (716) 645 3825
> Email: jb77 at buffalo.edu
> Web: http://www.acsu.buffalo.edu/~jb77/
>
> Office hours Tu/Th 3:30-4:30pm in 642 Baldy or via Zoom (Meeting ID 585
> 520 2411; Passcode Hoorheh)
>
> There’s A Crack In Everything - That’s How The Light Gets In
> (Leonard Cohen)
>
> --
>
>
>
>
>
> *From: *Lingtyp <lingtyp-bounces at listserv.linguistlist.org> on behalf of
> mohammad rasekh <mrasekhmahand at yahoo.com>
> *Date: *Saturday, February 18, 2023 at 5:06 AM
> *To: *LINGTYP LINGTYP <lingtyp at listserv.linguistlist.org>
> *Subject: *[Lingtyp] from connector to focus marker
>
> Dear All,
>
> There is a particle in Persian (Iranian language) which has multiple
> functions. This particle is ‘ke’, literally meaning ‘that’. Broadly, it has
> two general/main functions: a)connector (connecting complement, relative
> and adverbial clauses), b) marking some parts of information structure
> (focus, rhetorical question, mirativity, indifference, etc.). Concerning
> this particle, I have two questions:
>
> First, is there any evidence in other languages in which a particle moves
> from subordinator to information structure marker? If there is, I
> appreciate providing me with the sources.
>
> Second, the position of ‘ke’ as adverbial clause marker is not fixed. It
> may appear clause initially, but it moves to different parts of the
> adverbial clause (not the final position). Actually it ‘shifts’. Is there
> any evidence in other languages for this ‘subordinator shift’?
>
> Thanks in advance.
>
> Mohammad Rasekh-Mahand
>
>
>
>
>
> Mohammad Rasekh-Mahand
>
> Linguistics Department,
>
> Bu-Ali Sina University,
>
> Hamedan, Iran.
>
> Postal Code: 6517838695
>
> https://basu.academia.edu/MohammadRasekhmahand
> <https://nam12.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fbasu.academia.edu%2FMohammadRasekhmahand&data=05%7C01%7Cjb77%40buffalo.edu%7C6ca563e971dd45d2cd6f08db126ea21d%7C96464a8af8ed40b199e25f6b50a20250%7C0%7C0%7C638124038607478365%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=r527A9cJKKbx0BCa7x%2B3xlNu54ChV348VrOBaCyiWFU%3D&reserved=0>
>
> ,
>
> _______________________________________________
> Lingtyp mailing list
> Lingtyp at listserv.linguistlist.org
> https://listserv.linguistlist.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lingtyp
> <https://nam12.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flistserv.linguistlist.org%2Fcgi-bin%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Flingtyp&data=05%7C01%7Cjb77%40buffalo.edu%7C6ca563e971dd45d2cd6f08db126ea21d%7C96464a8af8ed40b199e25f6b50a20250%7C0%7C0%7C638124038607478365%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=%2BJtKA7f1GNZbiNHmztRovXyoYtvTn5%2F5L1%2Bh8DCVs8M%3D&reserved=0>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Lingtyp mailing list
> Lingtyp at listserv.linguistlist.org
> https://listserv.linguistlist.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lingtyp
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listserv.linguistlist.org/pipermail/lingtyp/attachments/20230220/eec76f0f/attachment.htm>
More information about the Lingtyp
mailing list