[Lingtyp] Non-TAME verbal categories

[Paolo Ramat]

Hello Adam,
among the TAME categories you quote there is 'Apprehension'. Remember
Seiler's 'dimensions' such as 'Possession' , 'Participation'
,'Identification', and also 'Apprehension'. All these 'categories' of the
'UNITYP' project have to do  with  some aspects of TAME.
Best,
Paolo

Prof. Dr. Paolo Ramat
Accademia Nazionale dei Lincei, Socio corrispondente
'Academia Europaea'
'Societas Linguistica Europaea', Honorary Member
Università di Pavia (retired)
Istituto Universitario di Studi Superiori (IUSS Pavia) (retired)

piazzetta Arduino 11 - I 27100 Pavia
##39 0382 27027
347 044 98 44


Il giorno mar 11 giu 2024 alle ore 18:19 Guillaume Jacques via Lingtyp <
lingtyp at listserv.linguistlist.org> ha scritto:

> Dear Adam,
>
> What about:
>
> Simulative (Simulative derivations in crosslinguistic perspective and
> their diachronic sources (benjamins.com)
> <https://benjamins.com/catalog/sl.22054.jac>) document (hal.science)
> <https://hal.science/hal-04217961/document>
> Periodic tense (Periodic tense markers in the world’s languages and their
> sources (degruyter.com)
> <https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/flin-2023-2013/html>) (6)
> Periodic tense markers in the world’s languages and their source |
> Guillaume Jacques - Academia.edu
> <https://www.academia.edu/100176007/Periodic_tense_markers_in_the_world_s_languages_and_their_source>
>
> Guillaume
>
>
> Le mar. 11 juin 2024 à 18:00, Adam James Ross Tallman via Lingtyp <
> lingtyp at listserv.linguistlist.org> a écrit :
>
>> Hello all,
>>
>> This is question for teaching purposes. I'm teaching a course on TAME
>> categories. I wanted to give a lecture discussing "other categories" that
>> are not always covered by TAME. Here is what I have thus far:
>>
>> •Pluractionality
>> •Mirativity
>> •Temporal remoteness
>> •Associated motion
>> •Associated posture
>> •Apprehension
>> •....
>>
>> Any other suggestions to add to this list would be helpful, leads to
>> literature would be even better.
>>
>> Note, that by non-TAME I don't mean to imply that these categories
>> couldn't be lumped in with tense, aspect, modality or evidentiality
>> (pluractionality is probably a type of aspect) ... just that people have
>> talked about these as grammatical categories in their own right and they
>> are not stereotypically discussed in the context of TAME. Actually the fun
>> cases are those where there is some literature arguing that the category is
>> really just some subpart of TAME (e.g. N. Hall on mirativity), because
>> reviewing this literature (+counter arguments) helps reinforce
>> understanding of the TAME concepts.
>>
>> best,
>>
>> Adam
>>
>> --
>> Adam J.R. Tallman
>> Post-doctoral Researcher
>> Friedrich Schiller Universität
>> Department of English Studies
>> _______________________________________________
>> Lingtyp mailing list
>> Lingtyp at listserv.linguistlist.org
>> https://listserv.linguistlist.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lingtyp
>>
>
>
> --
> Guillaume Jacques
>
> Directeur de recherches
> CNRS (CRLAO) - EPHE- INALCO
> https://scholar.google.fr/citations?user=1XCp2-oAAAAJ&hl=fr
> https://langsci-press.org/catalog/book/295
> <http://cnrs.academia.edu/GuillaumeJacques>
> http://panchr.hypotheses.org/
> _______________________________________________
> Lingtyp mailing list
> Lingtyp at listserv.linguistlist.org
> https://listserv.linguistlist.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lingtyp
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listserv.linguistlist.org/pipermail/lingtyp/attachments/20240611/d575dd1a/attachment.htm>