[Lingtyp] Contact-induced grammaticalisation withOUT replication of existing constructions

[Amanda Hamilton-Hollaway]

Dear Pun Ho et al.,

Perhaps the many examples of "ordinary" and "replica" grammaticalisation in Heine & Kuteva (2003) might be what you're looking for? (Though they focus on grammaticalisation in contact situations, not solely in code-switching, as I recall.)

Heine, B., & Kuteva, T. (2003). On contact-induced grammaticalization. Studies in Language, 27(3), 529–572. https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.27.3.04hei

Good wishes to all,
Amanda
Community Language Specialist / Lecturer in Linguistics
PKKP Aboriginal Corporation / University of Western Australia

________________________________
From: Lingtyp <lingtyp-bounces at listserv.linguistlist.org> on behalf of Pun Ho Lui via Lingtyp <lingtyp at listserv.linguistlist.org>
Sent: Saturday, July 26, 2025 11:11 PM
To: lingtyp at listserv.linguistlist.org <lingtyp at listserv.linguistlist.org>
Subject: [Lingtyp] Contact-induced grammaticalisation withOUT replication of existing constructions

Dear linguists,

I am wondering if anyone has reported any case of grammaticalisation emerged in code-switching.
The grammaticalised construction is not a replication of an existing construction in the code-switching languages because these languages do not have similar constructions.

Thank you.

Warmest,
Pun Ho Lui Joe
_______________________________________________
Lingtyp mailing list
Lingtyp at listserv.linguistlist.org
https://listserv.linguistlist.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lingtyp
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listserv.linguistlist.org/pipermail/lingtyp/attachments/20250728/970996ee/attachment.htm>