6.1104, Disc: Sex/Lang, Re: 1100

[The Linguist List]

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
LINGUIST List:  Vol-6-1104. Tue Aug 15 1995. ISSN: 1068-4875. Lines:  48
 
Subject: 6.1104, Disc: Sex/Lang, Re: 1100
 
Moderators: Anthony Rodrigues Aristar: Texas A&M U. <aristar at tam2000.tamu.edu>
            Helen Dry: Eastern Michigan U. <hdry at emunix.emich.edu>
 
Associate Editor:  Ljuba Veselinova <lveselin at emunix.emich.edu>
Assistant Editors: Ron Reck <rreck at emunix.emich.edu>
                   Ann Dizdar <dizdar at tam2000.tamu.edu>
                   Annemarie Valdez <avaldez at emunix.emich.edu>
 
Software development: John H. Remmers <remmers at emunix.emich.edu>
 
Editor for this issue: dseely at emunix.emich.edu (T. Daniel Seely)
 
---------------------------------Directory-----------------------------------
1)
Date:  Mon, 14 Aug 1995 16:23:51 EDT
From:  amr at CS.Wayne.EDU (Alexis Manaster Ramer)
Subject:  Re:  6.1100, Disc: Uniformitarianism, Re: 1086; Sex/Lang
 
---------------------------------Messages------------------------------------
1)
Date:  Mon, 14 Aug 1995 16:23:51 EDT
From:  amr at CS.Wayne.EDU (Alexis Manaster Ramer)
Subject:  Re:  6.1100, Disc: Uniformitarianism, Re: 1086; Sex/Lang
 
Dick Hudson's observations on US use of 'son' but not 'daughter'
as a vocative are very thought-provoking, but I am not sure that
it is fair to attribute this to "sons" being "treated like senior
relatives".  For one thing, we don't normally use 'brother' in
this way any more than we do 'daughter', and it is hard to imagine
a natural class comprising senior relatives and 'son' but excluding
'brother'. For another, there seem to me to be differences here.
If I am not imagining a distinction that is not there, it seems to
me that the senior relative terms are used in a wider variety of
contexts, e.g., calling out from a distance to get someone's attention,
and hence at the beginning of an utterance, whereas 'son' seems more
natural in utterances like 'Yes, son', 'Hand me that, son' than in
ones like
'Son!' or 'Son, help me!' (although perhaps these latter ones are not
completely impossible).
 
Alexis MR
------------------------------------------------------------------------
LINGUIST List: Vol-6-1104.