6.169 Fun: A semiotic view of WIN and DOS? for your musement...

[The Linguist List]

----------------------------------------------------------------------
LINGUIST List:  Vol-6-169. Tue 07 Feb 1995. ISSN: 1068-4875. Lines: 58
 
Subject: 6.169 Fun: A semiotic view of WIN and DOS? for your musement...
 
Moderators: Anthony Rodrigues Aristar: Texas A&M U. <aristar at tam2000.tamu.edu>
            Helen Dry: Eastern Michigan U. <hdry at emunix.emich.edu>
 
Asst. Editors: Ron Reck <rreck at emunix.emich.edu>
               Ann Dizdar <dizdar at tam2000.tamu.edu>
               Ljuba Veselinova <lveselin at emunix.emich.edu>
 
-------------------------Directory-------------------------------------
 
1)
Date: Thu, 2 Feb 1995 15:14:00 +0800 (PST)
From: alan harris (vcspc005 at huey.csun.edu)
Subject: a semiotic view of WIN and DOS? for your musement. . .
 
-------------------------Messages--------------------------------------
1)
Date: Thu, 2 Feb 1995 15:14:00 +0800 (PST)
From: alan harris (vcspc005 at huey.csun.edu)
Subject: a semiotic view of WIN and DOS? for your musement. . .
 
Definitely, a play of musement:
 Subject: The Software Schism (fwd)
Thanks to Nancy Owens (nowens at csun.edu) and Harold Goldwhite
 (harold_goldwhite at qmbridge.calstate.edu)
 
I append extracts from a piece by Umberto Eco that was first posted on the
Internet in Oct. 94: " ...I am firmly of the opinion that the Macintosh is
Catholic and that DOS is Protestant. Indeed the Mac is counterreformist and has
been influenced by the methodical path of the Jesuits.  It tells the faithful
how they must proceed step by step to reach-if not the kingdom of Heaven- the
moment in which their document is printed. It is catechistic; the essence of
revelation is dealt with via simple formulae and sumptuous icons.....DOS is
Protestant and even Calvinistic. It allows free interpretation of scripture,
demands difficult personal decisions, imposes a subtle hermeneutics upon the
user, and takes for granted the idea that not all can reach salvation. To make
the system work you need to interpret it yourself; the user is closed within
the loneliness of his own inner torment.....with the passage to Windows the DOS
universe has come to resemble more closely the counterreformist tolerance of
the Mac. It's true: Windows represents an Anglican-style schism -- big
ceremonies in the cathedral but with the possibility of returning to DOS to
fiddle with things. With Windows you can still decide to allow women and gays
to be priests if you want to. And what about the machine language that lies
beneath both operating systems? Ah, that is the stuff of the Old Testament,
Talmudic and Kabbalistic. "
 
       Alan C. Harris, Ph. D.          TELNOS: main off:  818-885-2853
       Professor, Communication/Linguistics  direct off:  818-885-2874
       Speech Communication Department
       California State University, Northridge     home:  818-366-3165
       SPCH CSUN                                    FAX:  818-885-2663
       Northridge, CA 91330-8257 Internet email: AHARRIS at HUEY.CSUN.EDU
 
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
LINGUIST List: Vol-6-169.