6.1448, Sum: After you, please.

[The Linguist List]

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
LINGUIST List:  Vol-6-1448. Wed Oct 18 1995. ISSN: 1068-4875. Lines:  73
 
Subject: 6.1448, Sum: After you, please.
 
Moderators: Anthony Rodrigues Aristar: Texas A&M U. <aristar at tam2000.tamu.edu>
            Helen Dry: Eastern Michigan U. <hdry at emunix.emich.edu>
 
Associate Editor:  Ljuba Veselinova <lveselin at emunix.emich.edu>
Assistant Editors: Ron Reck <rreck at emunix.emich.edu>
                   Ann Dizdar <dizdar at tam2000.tamu.edu>
                   Annemarie Valdez <avaldez at emunix.emich.edu>
 
Software development: John H. Remmers <remmers at emunix.emich.edu>
 
Editor for this issue: avaldez at emunix.emich.edu (Annemarie Valdez)
 
---------------------------------Directory-----------------------------------
1)
Date:  Wed, 18 Oct 1995 14:23:25 +0200
From:  hiro-t at ias.tokushima-u.ac.jp (hiro-t)
Subject:  Summary: After you, please.
 
---------------------------------Messages------------------------------------
1)
Date:  Wed, 18 Oct 1995 14:23:25 +0200
From:  hiro-t at ias.tokushima-u.ac.jp (hiro-t)
Subject:  Summary: After you, please.
 
Dear Linguists,
   I posted a a query on the acceptability of _After you, please_,
on behalf of my teacher at the university I graduated from a
couple of months ago. 13 people responded to my query. I wish to thank them
for their help with this troublesome problem.
 
  Jorge Koch (karpfen at zedat.fut-berlin.de)
  Lynne Hewitt (leh5 at psu.edu)
  Sharon goodman (S.Goodman at open.ac.uk)
  David M.W. powers (powers at ist. flinders.edu.au)
  Anton Sherwood (dasher at netcom.com)
  Bret Parker (bparker at vms1.cc.uop.edu)
  Elsa Lattey (elsa.lattey at uni-tuebingen.de)
  Hiroshi Nara (HNARA at vms.cis.pitt.edu)
  Steven Schaufele (fcosws at prairienet.org)
  James Kirchner (JPKIRCHNER at aol.com)
  Anthea F. Gupta (ellgupta at leonis.nus.sg)
  David. M.W. Powers (Powers at ist.flinders.edu.au)
  Karen H. Stanley (Karen_Stanley at cppcc.cc.nc.us)
 
The following table is the result of the acceptability.
 
         accpetable             unacceptable            ?
            7 people                 5                  1
 
One said it is a "Germanism", another said it is a repetition, and so on.
An interesting response was Sharon Goodman's answer from the viewpoint of
politeness behavior. But she did not want her comments on the list.
Please ask her directly. It was very interesting to me.
 
  Syntacticaly or grammatically, it is right to analyse the phrase
into (I will go) after you; please go ahead as Hiroshi Nara pointed out,
although we will definitely put an intonation that is different from
_Close the door, please_, and pause or comma.
  Or, as Karen Stanley said, this phrase is derived from _(Allow me
to go) after you, please._
 
  Thank you very much.
 
Best Wishes,
Hiroaki Tanaka, Tokushima University, japan
hiro-t at ias.tokushima-u.ac.jp
------------------------------------------------------------------------
LINGUIST List: Vol-6-1448.