7.492, All: 1st On-Line LINGUIST Conference
The Linguist List
linguist at tam2000.tamu.edu
Tue Apr 2 05:52:36 UTC 1996
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
LINGUIST List: Vol-7-492. Mon Apr 1 1996. ISSN: 1068-4875. Lines: 259
Subject: 7.492, All: 1st On-Line LINGUIST Conference
Moderators: Anthony Rodrigues Aristar: Texas A&M U. <aristar at tam2000.tamu.edu>
Helen Dry: Eastern Michigan U. <hdry at emunix.emich.edu> (On Leave)
T. Daniel Seely: Eastern Michigan U. <dseely at emunix.emich.edu>
Associate Editor: Ljuba Veselinova <lveselin at emunix.emich.edu>
Assistant Editors: Ron Reck <rreck at emunix.emich.edu>
Ann Dizdar <dizdar at tam2000.tamu.edu>
Annemarie Valdez <avaldez at emunix.emich.edu>
Software development: John H. Remmers <remmers at emunix.emich.edu>
Editor for this issue: aristar at tam2000.tamu.edu (Anthony M. Aristar)
---------------------------------Directory-----------------------------------
1)
Date: Mon, 01 Apr 1996 23:40:20 CST
From: linguist at tam2000.tamu.edu (The LINGUIST List)
Subject: 1st On-Line LINGUIST Conference
---------------------------------Messages------------------------------------
1)
Date: Mon, 01 Apr 1996 23:40:20 CST
From: linguist at tam2000.tamu.edu (The LINGUIST List)
Subject: 1st On-Line LINGUIST Conference
---- FIRST ON-LINE LINGUIST CONFERENCE ----
GEOMETRIC AND THEMATIC STRUCTURE IN BINDING
INTRODUCTION
LINGUIST is pleased to announce its first electronic linguistics
conference, "Geometric and Thematic Structure in Binding," to
be held in October 1996. A specific call for papers, with more
details of the theme of the meeting, will be posted today
in a regular LINGUIST "Calls" issue. Our purpose here is twofold:
(1) to explain the organization of the conference and solicit
any suggestions readers may have for improvement, and (2) to
emphasize that we hope electronic conferencing will eventually become
a regular feature of LINGUIST. If this conference is successful,
we will solicit proposals from subscribers and support the
organization of electronic conferences on other linguistic topics.
Conference Organizer: Daniel Seely
Technical Support: Anthony Aristar
Helen Dry
Background
Conference Theme (brief statement -- for more details, see
the Call for Papers, LINGUIST 7.493, at
URL http://www.emich.edu/~linguist/issues/html/7-493.html)
Conference Organization
Submission and Review Procedures
Technical Procedures
Session Organization
Procedures for Participation
To "Attend" the Conference
To Submit an Abstract
---------------------------------------------------
BACKGROUND
With this conference, we hope to further develop the impressive
potential of the internet to encourage interchange among
geographically-distant scholars.
Advantages of an electronic conference include:
Linguists can be actively involved just by turning
on the computer; this minimizes temporal, locational,
and financial constraints on conference participation.
Immediate archiving allows easy and permanent
access to conference procedings.
There are unique opportunites to foster public discussion
by specialists within and across subdisciplines.
Disadvantages: no restaurant guide
The goals of this first conference are serious linguistically but
modest technically. It is intended as a pilot project which will give us
valuable experience in determining how things can and should
work in the future. We hope that in the future other electronic
conferences will be proposed and organized by LINGUIST subscribers.
CONFERENCE THEME
Within the generative tradition, two major approaches to binding theory
can be identified: theta-based accounts and structure-based accounts.
The former defines the binding domain of some target element in
terms of co-argumenthood and often employs a theta hierarchy.
The latter exploits the geometry of a phrase marker
appealing to such purely structural notions as c-command, government,
or spec-head agreement. Many mixed approaches exist, for Chomsky (1986)
_Knowledge of Language_, for instance, the binding domain of an anaphor
is stated in terms of argument structure while the relation between an
anaphor and its antecedent requires c-command, but there are pure forms
on both sides.
The working goal of this conference is to explore the empirical and
theoretical advantages and disadvantages of theta-based vs structure-based
binding theories with the ultimate task of assessing where the
preponderance of current evidence falls.
Further details of the theme are available in a separate issue of
LINGUIST, under the topic "Calls:" Questions about the conference
theme should be addressed to Daniel Seely <dseely at emunix.emich.edu>
CONFERENCE ORGANIZATION
SUBMISSION & REVIEW PROCEDURES: Paper selection and review procedures
will be similar to those of a regular conference. Our time-frame is:
Call for papers: April 1
Deadline for abstracts: May 15, 1996
Abstracts will be reviewed anonymously by the Review Board:
REVIEW BOARD
Arild Hestvik
James Higginbotham
Howard Lasnik
Robert May
Pierre Pica
Eric Reuland
Daniel Seely
Wendy Wilkins
Final program announced: June 21, 1996
Final versions of papers submitted to the conference organizer by:
Sept 21, 1996
Conference: Oct 14 to Nov 4, 1996
TECHNICAL PROCEDURES:
There will be an email list, separate from LINGUIST,
for conference participants. LINGUIST subscribers
sign up for the conference, are put on this list,
and can participate actively or passively.
Papers will be mounted on a Web site and also
sent via email to conference participants.
Discussion of papers will take place on the
special conference email list.
Because the electronic medium requires extra reading
and discussion time, and because the participants
will be in different times zones, this conference
will take 3 weeks.
SESSION ORGANIZATION:
We plan to have 3 sessions, each with 3 - 4 papers.
All sessions will have a moderator drawn from
the Review Board listed above.
At the beginning of each session the session papers will
be sent to participants and mounted on the Web site.
Each session will consist of (in order):
a 2 day reading period
a 3 day discussion period, facilitated
by the moderator
a final statement by the moderator
At the end of the conference, there will be general discussion
of all papers and comments, and a
Keynote Address (Howard Lasnik)
PROCEDURES FOR PARTICIPATION:
TO "ATTEND" THE CONFERENCE:
Send an email message to:
listserv at tamvm1.tamu.edu
The message should consist of the single line:
subscribe linconf firstname lastname
Ex: subscribe linconf Jane Doe
The conference signup period will extend from April 1 to the end of the
conference.
At the end of the conference, participants will be automatically
unsubscribed from the linconf list.
TO SUBMIT AN ABSTRACT:
Check the formal Call for Papers (LINGUIST 7.493) for a full description
of the conference theme. Deadline for abstracts is May 15, 1996
Submit a 1-page abstract electronically to
abstract at tamvm1.tamu.edu
The first 3 lines of the message should consist of
Your name
Your email address
The title of the abstract
Then leave at least 3 blank lines before beginning the abstract.
The abstract itself should also begin with the title. But no other
identifying information should be included.
Abstracts will be reviewed anonymously. So the conference organizers
will strip off the 3-line identifying information as well as the mail
header before submitting the abstract to the Review Board.
Since abstracts and papers will be distributed via email, and
many participants will not have MIME or unicode-compliant mailers,
All text must be in ASCII.
Conference URL: http://www.emich.edu/~linguist/linconf.html
Questions about the conference should be addressed to the conference
organizer: Daniel Seely
dseely at emunix.emich.edu
-----------------------------------------------------
Again, we solicit your comments and suggestions about the organization
of this conference.
--Daniel, Anthony, Helen
------------------------------------------------------------------------
LINGUIST List: Vol-7-492.
More information about the LINGUIST
mailing list