7.173, Disc: Emphasis, Hostility markers

[The Linguist List]

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
LINGUIST List:  Vol-7-173. Sat Feb 3 1996. ISSN: 1068-4875. Lines:  76
 
Subject: 7.173, Disc: Emphasis, Hostility markers
 
Moderators: Anthony Rodrigues Aristar: Texas A&M U. <aristar at tam2000.tamu.edu>
            Helen Dry: Eastern Michigan U. <hdry at emunix.emich.edu> (On Leave)
            T. Daniel Seely: Eastern Michigan U. <dseely at emunix.emich.edu>
 
Associate Editor:  Ljuba Veselinova <lveselin at emunix.emich.edu>
Assistant Editors: Ron Reck <rreck at emunix.emich.edu>
                   Ann Dizdar <dizdar at tam2000.tamu.edu>
                   Annemarie Valdez <avaldez at emunix.emich.edu>
 
Software development: John H. Remmers <remmers at emunix.emich.edu>
 
Editor for this issue: dseely at emunix.emich.edu (T. Daniel Seely)
 
---------------------------------Directory-----------------------------------
1)
Date:  Fri, 02 Feb 1996 13:35:24
From:  LEFFIN at bach.cuw.edu ("Prof. Tracey Leffin-Hedrick")
Subject:  Disc: Emphasis
 
2)
Date:  Sat, 03 Feb 1996 13:55:12 +0600
From:  ocls at sibylline.com (George Elgin, Suzette Haden Elgin)
Subject:  Summary: Hostility Markers
 
---------------------------------Messages------------------------------------
1)
Date:  Fri, 02 Feb 1996 13:35:24
From:  LEFFIN at bach.cuw.edu ("Prof. Tracey Leffin-Hedrick")
Subject:  Disc: Emphasis
 
The phenomenon under discussion may not be all that recent.  Many of
the students who read the daily announcements over the public address
system at my high school in the mid-late 1970's (Wisconsin) also
exhibited this unusual emphasis on _will_.----
Tracey Leffin-Hedrick
Concordia University Wisconsin
email:  leffin at bach.cuw.edu
phone:  (414)243-4219
------------------------------------------------------------------------
2)
Date:  Sat, 03 Feb 1996 13:55:12 +0600
From:  ocls at sibylline.com (George Elgin, Suzette Haden Elgin)
Subject:  Summary: Hostility Markers
 
I recently posted a summary of responses to a query about hostility markers
in spoken English, but I didn't wait quite long enough. I'd like to post
one more response, from Ted Harding (Ted Harding at nessie.mcc.ac.uk),
excerpted below as follows:
 
"Suppose it is possible to convey the same words acoustically (say over a
microphone-speaker link, as in a radio play) either with hostile or with
non-hostile meaning, ... and that this can be achieved by intent; and that
it is systematically perceived as intended by listeners. Then, in
principle, the acoustical differences can be ascertained by measurement
and, again in principle, categorized statistically on the basis of a
sufficiently large and varied corpus. The supposition is testable by
psychoacoustical experiment.
 
What would be involved in succeeding with the recognition and
categorization of the 'hostility marker' is beyond my guessing, and in any
case would be likely to be controversial and to require a lot of work and
data. Nonetheless, it seems to me that the business is measurable in
principle."
 
        I would welcome any additional comments to the original query and
summary, or to Dr. Harding's posting.
 
Suzette Haden Elgin
PO Box 1137, Huntsville AR 72740-1137 USA
------------------------------------------------------------------------
LINGUIST List: Vol-7-173.