11.103, Qs: Czech and Polish Fonts, Implicature

LINGUIST Network linguist at linguistlist.org
Thu Jan 20 06:58:24 UTC 2000


LINGUIST List:  Vol-11-103. Thu Jan 20 2000. ISSN: 1068-4875.

Subject: 11.103, Qs: Czech and Polish Fonts, Implicature

Moderators: Anthony Rodrigues Aristar: Wayne State U.<aristar at linguistlist.org>
            Helen Dry: Eastern Michigan U. <hdry at linguistlist.org>
            Andrew Carnie: U. of Arizona <carnie at linguistlist.org>

Reviews: Andrew Carnie: U. of Arizona <carnie at linguistlist.org>

Associate Editors:  Martin Jacobsen <marty at linguistlist.org>
                    Ljuba Veselinova <ljuba at linguistlist.org>
		    Scott Fults <scott at linguistlist.org>
		    Jody Huellmantel <jody at linguistlist.org>
		    Karen Milligan <karen at linguistlist.org>

Assistant Editors:  Lydia Grebenyova <lydia at linguistlist.org>
		    Naomi Ogasawara <naomi at linguistlist.org>
		    James Yuells <james at linguistlist.org>

Software development: John H. Remmers <remmers at emunix.emich.edu>
                      Sudheendra Adiga <sudhi at linguistlist.org>
                      Qian Liao <qian at linguistlist.org>

Home Page:  http://linguistlist.org/


Editor for this issue: Naomi Ogasawara <naomi at linguistlist.org>
 ==========================================================================

We'd like to remind readers that the responses to queries are usually
best posted to the individual asking the question. That individual is
then  strongly encouraged to post a summary to the list.   This policy was
instituted to help control the huge volume of mail on LINGUIST; so we
would appreciate your cooperating with it whenever it seems appropriate.

=================================Directory=================================

1)
Date:  Thu, 20 Jan 2000 09:57:24 +1300
From:  Andrew Carstairs-McCarthy <a.carstairs-mccarthy at ling.canterbury.ac.nz>
Subject:  Czech and Polish Fonts

2)
Date:  Thu, 20 Jan 2000 9:28:11 +0800
From:  Ðíºº³É <hanch-xu at jlonline.com>
Subject:  Implicature

-------------------------------- Message 1 -------------------------------

Date:  Thu, 20 Jan 2000 09:57:24 +1300
From:  Andrew Carstairs-McCarthy <a.carstairs-mccarthy at ling.canterbury.ac.nz>
Subject:  Czech and Polish Fonts

I would like to get hold of Mac-compatible fonts that can handle Czech and
Polish characters and diacritics, in Times New Roman style or similar.  Can
anyone advise, please?


Andrew Carstairs-McCarthy
Associate Professor
Department of Linguistics, University of Canterbury, Private Bag 4800,
Christchurch, New Zealand
phone (work) +64-3-364 2211; (home) +64-3-355 5108
fax +64-3-364 2969
e-mail a.c-mcc at ling.canterbury.ac.nz
http://www.ling.canterbury.ac.nz/adc-m.html


-------------------------------- Message 2 -------------------------------

Date:  Thu, 20 Jan 2000 9:28:11 +0800
From:  Ðíºº³É <hanch-xu at jlonline.com>
Subject:  Implicature

Dear members:

I wonder if  anyone can tell me how Halliday defines his notion of
"meaning potential" and point out the references.
Have anyone done any research into implicature from the systematic functional
grammar? Do think it is possible to use the concept of "meaning potential"
as a point of departure for studying pragmatic meaning of utterance as
implicatum?

My second question concerns one of examples of Grice's. That is
"He is an Englishman; he is, therefore, brave."
Grice considers this utterance as an example of conventional implicature.
He explains that the speaker only "indicated" (so "implied")and did not
"say" that he is brave is the result that he is an Englishman.
I can not understand Grice in this. Result I think is a part of the meaning
components of word "therefore".
So the speaker does say that it is the case. I'm puzzled really.
Recently I read a book of Russian linguistists in which it is said that the
example is based on certain "culture model". I am not a native speaker and
English is not even my major. I am interested if you consider the example
as a represention of "conventional implicature" and why, or it contains no
implicatum at all.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
LINGUIST List: Vol-11-103



More information about the LINGUIST mailing list