11.667, Disc: New: Focus

[The LINGUIST Network]

LINGUIST List:  Vol-11-667. Fri Mar 24 2000. ISSN: 1068-4875.

Subject: 11.667, Disc: New: Focus

Moderators: Anthony Rodrigues Aristar, Wayne State U.<aristar at linguistlist.org>
            Helen Dry, Eastern Michigan U. <hdry at linguistlist.org>
            Andrew Carnie, U. of Arizona <carnie at linguistlist.org>

Reviews: Andrew Carnie: U. of Arizona <carnie at linguistlist.org>

Associate Editors:  Ljuba Veselinova, Stockholm U. <ljuba at linguistlist.org>
		    Scott Fults, E. Michigan U. <scott at linguistlist.org>
		    Jody Huellmantel, Wayne State U. <jody at linguistlist.org>
		    Karen Milligan, Wayne State U. <karen at linguistlist.org>

Assistant Editors:  Lydia Grebenyova, E. Michigan U. <lydia at linguistlist.org>
		    Naomi Ogasawara, E. Michigan U. <naomi at linguistlist.org>
		    James Yuells, Wayne State U. <james at linguistlist.org>

Software development: John Remmers, E. Michigan U. <remmers at emunix.emich.edu>
                      Sudheendra Adiga, Wayne State U. <sudhi at linguistlist.org>
                      Qian Liao, E. Michigan U. <qian at linguistlist.org>

Home Page:  http://linguistlist.org/

The LINGUIST List is funded jointly by Eastern Michigan University,
Wayne State University, and donations from subscribers and publishers.

Editor for this issue: Karen Milligan <karen at linguistlist.org>

=================================Directory=================================

1)
Date:  Thu, 23 Mar 2000 10:41:56 +0000 (GMT)
From:  Alex Monaghan CA <alex at compapp.dcu.ie>
Subject:  Re: 11.656, Null focused item?

-------------------------------- Message 1 -------------------------------

Date:  Thu, 23 Mar 2000 10:41:56 +0000 (GMT)
From:  Alex Monaghan CA <alex at compapp.dcu.ie>
Subject:  Re: 11.656, Null focused item?

colleagues,
as a non-believer in contrastive focus (which is simply narrow focus on an
element which can be interpreted as contrasting with some other element in the
context - just like every other case of narriw focus!), i'm interested in the
assumptions being made by fritz newmeyer.

firstly, if it were possible to focus a null argument, how would you tell? what
would the realisation of focus be?

secondly, in his example
Q: Who broke the dish?
A: You know who!
it seems to me that there are several possible focuses (i don't like "foci"):
YOU, or KNOW, or the whole thing. none of these corresponds to null focus.

thirdly, it seems to me that a much more null-focus-like example would be
Q: Who broke the dish?
A: Who broke the dish?
with broad focus and the same WH-question contour in both cases, but an ironic
or exasperated tone in the second, the intended interpretation being something
like "work it out for yourself" or "that's a stupid question" or even "who
breaks everything around here?"

it seems, then, that in the absence of any particular narrow focus, even when
all the elements of the message are clearly "given", we revert to broad focus
and rely on the listener's knowledge of "givenness" to produce an appropriate
interpretation.

this seems sensible, as a true null focus utterance would basically be saying
"this adds no information to the context, and allows no new inferences" whereas
focus on "given" information says "there's an inference from this information
which you have missed". similarly, the absence of focus on "new" information
says "this is information which may seem new but is actually already known or
deducible": that's why we can deaccent "the great composer" in an utterance like
"Bach was very fond of chips, but the great composer couldn't abide vinegar on
them", and even in an utterance like "my uncle fred had cancer, but the great
composer made a full recovery" where the speaker is the only one who knows that
uncle fred is a great composer.

so, i'd be very surprised if languages use null focus - it has no communicative
purpose - but i'd be interested in any data from languages other than the
germanic and romance families.

in expectation,
		alex monaghan.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
LINGUIST List: Vol-11-667