15.624, Qs: Vowel Systems/Quantity; Parasitic Gaps

[LINGUIST List]

LINGUIST List:  Vol-15-624. Mon Feb 16 2004. ISSN: 1068-4875.

Subject: 15.624, Qs: Vowel Systems/Quantity; Parasitic Gaps

Moderators: Anthony Aristar, Wayne State U.<aristar at linguistlist.org>
            Helen Dry, Eastern Michigan U. <hdry at linguistlist.org>

Reviews (reviews at linguistlist.org):
	Sheila Collberg, U. of Arizona
	Terence Langendoen, U. of Arizona

Home Page:  http://linguistlist.org/

The LINGUIST List is funded by Eastern Michigan University, Wayne
State University, and donations from subscribers and publishers.

Editor for this issue: Naomi Fox <fox at linguistlist.org>
 ==========================================================================
We'd like to remind readers that the responses to queries are usually
best posted to the individual asking the question. That individual is
then strongly encouraged to post a summary to the list. This policy was
instituted to help control the huge volume of mail on LINGUIST; so we
would appreciate your cooperating with it whenever it seems appropriate.

In addition to posting a summary, we'd like to remind people that it
is usually a good idea to personally thank those individuals who have
taken the trouble to respond to the query.

To post to LINGUIST, use our convenient web form at
http://linguistlist.org/LL/posttolinguist.html.

=================================Directory=================================

1)
Date:  Sun, 15 Feb 2004 13:44:17 -0500 (EST)
From:  Oliver Pechenik <oliver_pechenik at milton.edu>
Subject:  changes in vowel systems

2)
Date:  Mon, 16 Feb 2004 01:55:04 -0500 (EST)
From:  Shinya Uchishiba <i900201 at kansaigaidai.ac.jp>
Subject:  A query about parasitic gaps

-------------------------------- Message 1 -------------------------------

Date:  Sun, 15 Feb 2004 13:44:17 -0500 (EST)
From:  Oliver Pechenik <oliver_pechenik at milton.edu>
Subject:  changes in vowel systems

I have been wondering about historical developments of vowel systems.
There seem to be various mechanisms for changes in vowel quality.  But
it is hard to find explanations for changes in vowel quantity,
excepting changes caused by association with other languages.  Do you
know of any recorded examples of changes in vowel quantity not
effected by a neighboring language?  Thanks.


-------------------------------- Message 2 -------------------------------

Date:  Mon, 16 Feb 2004 01:55:04 -0500 (EST)
From:  Shinya Uchishiba <i900201 at kansaigaidai.ac.jp>
Subject:  A query about parasitic gaps

Dear Linguists,

As well known, parasitic gaps are licensed inside subject islands.  In
addition, they can appear inside internal arguments, as shown below:

(1)  Who did John show pictures of (pg) to (t)?
                                 (Nissembaum 2000: ft 10, p106)

I wish to know if in a double object construction parasitic gaps can
appear both inside the subject and inside the indirect object, as in
(2c).

(2) a. Which book did everyone who read (pg) send back Bill
       (t)?
    b. Which book did John send back the author of (pg) (t)?
    c. Which book did everyone who read (pg) send back the
       author of (pg) (t)?

If all the parasitic gaps in (2) are licensed, they provide clues for
elucidating the structure of a DOC, I think.  Given Nissenbaum's
(2000) in-depth investigation of parasitic gaps (''investigations of
covert phrase movement''), the parasitic gaps in (2c) suggest that the
wh-operator moves over the indirect object as a first step and then
over the subject as a second step.  If so, verbal projections should
be stacked in the structure in question, as several generativists have
already proposed.

I would be very grateful for any information and any data concerning
the topic.  Thank you in advance.

Sincerely,

Shinya Uchishiba

Subject-Language: English; Code: ENG

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
LINGUIST List: Vol-15-624