16.2552, Diss: Socioling/Syntax: D'Arcy: 'Like: Syntax and ...'

[LINGUIST List]

LINGUIST List: Vol-16-2552. Mon Sep 05 2005. ISSN: 1068 - 4875.

Subject: 16.2552, Diss: Socioling/Syntax: D'Arcy: 'Like: Syntax and ...'

Moderators: Anthony Aristar, Wayne State U <aristar at linguistlist.org>
            Helen Aristar-Dry, Eastern Michigan U <hdry at linguistlist.org>
 
Reviews (reviews at linguistlist.org) 
        Sheila Dooley, U of Arizona  
        Terry Langendoen, U of Arizona  

Homepage: http://linguistlist.org/

The LINGUIST List is funded by Eastern Michigan University, Wayne
State University, and donations from subscribers and publishers.

Editor for this issue: Takako Matsui <tako at linguistlist.org>
================================================================  

To post to LINGUIST, use our convenient web form at
http://linguistlist.org/LL/posttolinguist.html.


===========================Directory==============================  

1)
Date: 03-Sep-2005
From: Alexandra D'Arcy < alex.darcy at utoronto.ca >
Subject: Like: Syntax and Development 

	
-------------------------Message 1 ---------------------------------- 
Date: Mon, 05 Sep 2005 11:41:37
From: Alexandra D'Arcy < alex.darcy at utoronto.ca >
Subject: Like: Syntax and Development 
 

Institution: University of Toronto 
Program: Department of Linguistics 
Dissertation Status: Completed 
Degree Date: 2005 

Author: Alexandra D'Arcy

Dissertation Title: Like: Syntax and Development 

Linguistic Field(s): Sociolinguistics
                     Syntax

Subject Language(s): English (eng)


Dissertation Director(s):
Sali Tagliamonte

Dissertation Abstract:

Discourse LIKE, as in (1), is one of the most salient features of present-day
vernacular English.  

(1)   a.  LIKE, Carrie's LIKE a little LIKE out-of-it but LIKE she's the
funniest. (3/T/f/18)
       b.  Well, you just cut out LIKE a girl figure and a boy figure. (N/8/f/75)

It is overtly stigmatized and associated with adolescents, where it is perceived
as a crutch for lexical indecision (e.g., Diamond 2000; Siegel 2000).  In the
literature, LIKE is sometimes characterized as a 'meaningless interjection'
(OED) that can be used 'grammatically anywhere' (Siegel 2002:64).  Descriptions
such as these suggest that LIKE is unconstrained, yet language, despite inherent
variability, is rule-governed (see also Underhill 1988; Andersen 2001). 

LIKE has received much attention in the pragmatic literature (e.g., Schourup
1983; Andersen 1997 et seq.), but it has never been investigated from a
variationist perspective. Consequently, this dissertation presents an
accountable analysis of LIKE is a large corpus of contemporary English.  The
hypothesis developed in this work is that LIKE is not random, but interacts with
syntactic structure in regular and predictable ways.  To address this issue, the
variable context is circumscribed according to structural criteria and the
analyses are embedded within current Minimalist Theory (e.g., Chomsky 1995 et
seq.).  Over 20,000 structurally defined contexts are examined, comprising data
from 97 speakers between the ages of 10 and 87.

This method reveals that LIKE is 1) highly constrained by the syntax and 2)
occurs in specific positions among speakers of all ages.  Indeed, examination of
language-internal constraints reveals that the community shares a single
variable grammar for LIKE (Poplack & Tagliamonte 2001).  This feature is shown
to have developed gradually and systematically, arriving at its current state
through regular processes of language change.  Using the grammaticalization
models proposed by Traugott (1997 [1995]) and Brinton (forthcoming), it is
argued that after initially developing as a discourse marker, where it occurs
clause-initially and links sequences of dialogue (Fraser 1988, 1990), LIKE then
begins to enter syntactic structure, spreading to one maximal projection at a time.





-----------------------------------------------------------
LINGUIST List: Vol-16-2552