18.2089, Diss: Syntax: Sheehan: 'The EPP and Null Subjects in Romance'
LINGUIST Network
linguist at LINGUISTLIST.ORG
Tue Jul 10 20:12:54 UTC 2007
LINGUIST List: Vol-18-2089. Tue Jul 10 2007. ISSN: 1068 - 4875.
Subject: 18.2089, Diss: Syntax: Sheehan: 'The EPP and Null Subjects in Romance'
Moderators: Anthony Aristar, Eastern Michigan U <aristar at linguistlist.org>
Helen Aristar-Dry, Eastern Michigan U <hdry at linguistlist.org>
Reviews: Randall Eggert, U of Utah
<reviews at linguistlist.org>
Homepage: http://linguistlist.org/
The LINGUIST List is funded by Eastern Michigan University,
and donations from subscribers and publishers.
Editor for this issue: Hunter Lockwood <hunter at linguistlist.org>
================================================================
To post to LINGUIST, use our convenient web form at
http://linguistlist.org/LL/posttolinguist.html.
===========================Directory==============================
1)
Date: 10-Jul-2007
From: Michelle Sheehan < michelle.sheehan at ncl.ac.uk >
Subject: The EPP and Null Subjects in Romance
-------------------------Message 1 ----------------------------------
Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2007 16:11:03
From: Michelle Sheehan < michelle.sheehan at ncl.ac.uk >
Subject: The EPP and Null Subjects in Romance
Institution: Newcastle University
Program: School of English Literature, Language & Linguistics (SELLL)
Dissertation Status: Completed
Degree Date: 2006
Author: Michelle Louise Sheehan
Dissertation Title: The EPP and Null Subjects in Romance
Dissertation URL: http://people.pwf.cam.ac.uk/mtb23/NSP/Sheehan%20dissertation.html
Linguistic Field(s): Syntax
Dissertation Director(s):
Anders Holmberg
Ian G. Roberts
Dissertation Abstract:
This dissertation assesses how null subjects in Romance might be accounted
for in a Minimalist framework. It is argued, contra Alexiadou and
Anagnostopoulou (1998) and Barbosa (1995), that Romance null subject
languages (NSLs) have an active EPP of the 'merge XP' type, and that
agreement morphology in said languages is the uninterpretable, PF
realisation of valued phi-features on I. Evidence for this claim comes from
(i) the behaviour of preverbal subjects, (ii) restrictions on possible word
orders, and (iii) evidence for the existence of null expletives/locatives.
An examination of word order possibilities in different pragmatic contexts
shows that, invariably, SVO is 'unmarked.' A slight complication comes from
Spanish, which allows VSO order in such contexts, only where another XP
surfaces preverbally. As such, it appears to be the case that spec IP is
obligatorily filled in Romance NSLs. In short, 'free inversion' is not the
result simply of verb movement to the I-domain, rather it is either; (i) a
form of locative inversion, (ii) expletive-associate inversion, or (ii) the
product of prosodic interface conditions.
Null referential subjects, it is proposed, are derived via deletion under
non-distinctness in the phonological component. In NSLs, the head I bears
an uninterpretable [uD] feature (Roberts 2004), and assuming that valued
formal features have the same status as PF-features for the phonological
component, the featural make-up of a pronominal subject is a subset of that
of I.
Finally, Brazilian Portuguese (BP) is discussed. While BP is not an NSL, it
does license null expletive, locative, generic and bound embedded subjects. It
is argued that the limited availability of null subjects in BP is
because: (i) spec IP need not be PF-visible, and (ii) subjects raise to a
topic position in BP, a Topic prominent language. Once again, null subjects
are the result of deletion/null spellout in the phonological component.
-----------------------------------------------------------
LINGUIST List: Vol-18-2089
More information about the LINGUIST
mailing list